Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Brush control impacts on rangeland wildlife

Jerry L. Holechek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 1981, 36 (5) 265-269;
Jerry L. Holechek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

DEMANDS on rangeland for red meat, water, wildlife, and recreation are increasing. Meanwhile, about 32 percent of the rangeland in the United States is in poor condition, and 50 percent is in fair condition (5).

Invasion of grassland by woody plants caused by overgrazing, temporary cultivation, or a reduction in burning has been the primary cause of the declining rangeland condition over the past hundred years. Once desirable plants are eliminated and brush invasion occurs, range improvement is difficult. Associated with brush invasion is a gradual reduction in groundcover, which can result in serious soil erosion. Many brush species will permanently occupy an area once they have become established, regardless of whether livestock grazing occurs or not. Therefore, range improvements are necessary.

Although heavy stands of brush are generally undesirable, range managers now recognize that limited quantities of woody plants should be maintained even when the goal of management is primarily livestock production. This is because shrubs provide shade in the summer, high quality forage during drought, and a food source during the winter. The deep root systems of shrubs stabilize stream banks and prevent soil from sliding in steep areas. Shrubs also help stabilize rangeland ecosystems as well as …

Footnotes

  • Jerry L. Holechek is an assistant professor of range ecology, Department of Animal and Range Sciences. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, 88003. Journal article 843, New Mexico Agricultural Experimental Station.

  • Copyright 1981 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 36 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 36, Issue 5
September/October 1981
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brush control impacts on rangeland wildlife
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Brush control impacts on rangeland wildlife
Jerry L. Holechek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 1981, 36 (5) 265-269;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Brush control impacts on rangeland wildlife
Jerry L. Holechek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 1981, 36 (5) 265-269;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society