Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Watershed impact on stream water quality: A technique for regional assessment

Miles M. Smart, Terry W. Barney and John R. Jones
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 1981, 36 (5) 297-300;
Miles M. Smart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry W. Barney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 36 no. 5 297-300

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online September 1, 1981.

Copyright & Usage 
Copyright 1981 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. Miles M. Smart,
  2. Terry W. Barney, and
  3. John R. Jones

Article usage

Article usage: October 2008 to September 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 2008100
Nov 20081600
Dec 2008601
Jan 2009100
Mar 2009201
Apr 2009400
May 20091701
Jun 2009700
Jul 2009101
Aug 2009100
Sep 2009200
Oct 20091400
Nov 2009801
Dec 2009900
Jan 20101405
Feb 2010801
Mar 20101400
Apr 20102100
May 20102102
Jun 20101000
Jul 2010900
Aug 2010800
Sep 20101100
Oct 2010700
Nov 20101500
Dec 2010602
Jan 2011700
Feb 20111301
Mar 20112200
Apr 2011500
May 20111501
Jun 2011600
Jul 2011500
Aug 2011700
Sep 2011301
Oct 2011400
Nov 2011600
Dec 2011500
Jan 2012501
Feb 20121400
Mar 20122002
Apr 20121303
May 20121300
Jun 20121102
Jul 2012400
Aug 2012401
Sep 2012200
Oct 20121000
Nov 2012700
Dec 2012500
Jan 2013201
Feb 20131800
Mar 20131801
Apr 20131401
May 20131700
Jun 2013201
Jul 2013500
Aug 2013400
Oct 2013400
Jan 2014101
Feb 2014703
Mar 2014100
May 2014300
Aug 2014401
Sep 2014200
Oct 2014600
Nov 2014100
Dec 2014200
Jan 2015100
Feb 2015100
Mar 2015200
Apr 2015300
May 2015300
Jun 2015600
Jul 2015200
Aug 2015500
Sep 2015300
Oct 2015100
Nov 2015200
Dec 2015100
Jan 2016201
Apr 2016400
May 2016100
Jul 2016100
Aug 2016200
Sep 2016100
Oct 2016500
Nov 2016100
Dec 2016200
Jan 2017500
Feb 2017100
Mar 2017700
Apr 2017401
May 2017400
Jun 2017300
Sep 2017300
Nov 2017400
Dec 2017200
Jan 2018400
Feb 2018200
Mar 2018103
Apr 2018100
May 2018400
Jul 2018200
Aug 2018101
Nov 2018200
Jan 2019100
Mar 2019100
Apr 2019701
Jun 2019200
Aug 2019400
Sep 2019400
Nov 2019100
Dec 2019400
Jan 2020501
Feb 2020300
Jun 2020700
Jul 2020100
Aug 20201100
Sep 2020400
Oct 2020700
Nov 2020600
Dec 2020200
Jan 2021300
Feb 2021500
Mar 2021300
Apr 2021800
Jun 2021700
Jul 2021200
Sep 2021700
Oct 2021900
Nov 20211000
Dec 2021900
Jan 2022900
Feb 20221100
Mar 2022600
Apr 20221500
May 2022800
Jun 2022800
Jul 2022200
Aug 2022500
Sep 2022300
Oct 2022300
Dec 2022400
Jan 20232200
Feb 2023300
Mar 2023500
Apr 2023100
May 2023300
Jun 2023300
Jul 2023400
Aug 2023300
Sep 2023500

Cited By...

  • 14 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 36 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 36, Issue 5
September/October 1981
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Watershed impact on stream water quality: A technique for regional assessment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Watershed impact on stream water quality: A technique for regional assessment
Miles M. Smart, Terry W. Barney, John R. Jones
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 1981, 36 (5) 297-300;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Watershed impact on stream water quality: A technique for regional assessment
Miles M. Smart, Terry W. Barney, John R. Jones
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 1981, 36 (5) 297-300;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Cropping system drives microbial community response to simulated climate change and plant inputs
  • Compost amendment to enhance carbon sequestration in rangelands
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society