ABSTRACT:
Five different, newly reconstructed soil units on surface-mined land and three undisturbed (cultivated, but not mined) soil units were defined and characterized. Selected properties of the reclaimed soils were compared with those of nearby undisturbed soils to determine what changes took place during the mining and reclamation operations. The properties of the five constructed soil units were closely related to premining overburden characteristics and method of soil construction. Comparisons of each of the eight soil units emphasized differences between constructed soils and undisturbed soils, between mining sites, and between topsoil and spoil units within each of the mining sites. Compared with the undisturbed soils, the constructed soils had higher bulk densities and lacked structure. Both the undisturbed soils and constructed soils had moderately fine textures. Organic carbon levels were lower for the constructed soils except in the surfaces of the units that had been topsoiled. In general, the pH, exchangeable calcium levels, and exchangeable sodium levels were higher and the exchangeable magnesium levels were equal or higher in the constructed soils than in the natural soils. The properties of the constructed soils reflect premining overburden character and method of soil construction, suggesting that considerable control over postmine soil characteristics can be managed by careful selection of materials and material-handling methods.
Footnotes
Sam J. Indorante is a soil scientist with the Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pinckneyville, Illinois 62274. Ivan J. Jansen is an associate professor of pedology, University of Illinois, Urbana, 61801. Charles W. Boast is an associate professor of soil physics, University of Illinois. This study was supported by funds from the State of Illinois and the Environmental Protection Agency in cooperation with the Cooperative States Research Service, Amax Coal Company, Consolidation Coal Company, Peabody Coal Company, Robertson and Associates, and Southwestern Illinois Coal Company.
- Copyright 1981 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.