Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Surface mining and reclamation: Initial changes in soil character

Sam J. Indorante, Ivan J. Jansen and Charles W. Boast
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 1981, 36 (6) 347-351;
Sam J. Indorante
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan J. Jansen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles W. Boast
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Five different, newly reconstructed soil units on surface-mined land and three undisturbed (cultivated, but not mined) soil units were defined and characterized. Selected properties of the reclaimed soils were compared with those of nearby undisturbed soils to determine what changes took place during the mining and reclamation operations. The properties of the five constructed soil units were closely related to premining overburden characteristics and method of soil construction. Comparisons of each of the eight soil units emphasized differences between constructed soils and undisturbed soils, between mining sites, and between topsoil and spoil units within each of the mining sites. Compared with the undisturbed soils, the constructed soils had higher bulk densities and lacked structure. Both the undisturbed soils and constructed soils had moderately fine textures. Organic carbon levels were lower for the constructed soils except in the surfaces of the units that had been topsoiled. In general, the pH, exchangeable calcium levels, and exchangeable sodium levels were higher and the exchangeable magnesium levels were equal or higher in the constructed soils than in the natural soils. The properties of the constructed soils reflect premining overburden character and method of soil construction, suggesting that considerable control over postmine soil characteristics can be managed by careful selection of materials and material-handling methods.

Footnotes

  • Sam J. Indorante is a soil scientist with the Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pinckneyville, Illinois 62274. Ivan J. Jansen is an associate professor of pedology, University of Illinois, Urbana, 61801. Charles W. Boast is an associate professor of soil physics, University of Illinois. This study was supported by funds from the State of Illinois and the Environmental Protection Agency in cooperation with the Cooperative States Research Service, Amax Coal Company, Consolidation Coal Company, Peabody Coal Company, Robertson and Associates, and Southwestern Illinois Coal Company.

  • Copyright 1981 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 36 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 36, Issue 6
November/December 1981
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surface mining and reclamation: Initial changes in soil character
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Surface mining and reclamation: Initial changes in soil character
Sam J. Indorante, Ivan J. Jansen, Charles W. Boast
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 1981, 36 (6) 347-351;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Surface mining and reclamation: Initial changes in soil character
Sam J. Indorante, Ivan J. Jansen, Charles W. Boast
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 1981, 36 (6) 347-351;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Cropping system drives microbial community response to simulated climate change and plant inputs
  • Compost amendment to enhance carbon sequestration in rangelands
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society