Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

A technique for evaluating feedlot pollution potential

R. A. Young, M. A. Otterby and Amos Roos
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1982, 37 (1) 21-23;
R. A. Young
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Otterby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amos Roos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

PUBLIC cost-sharing funds to alleviate animal feedlot pollution are usually awarded on the basis of subjective evaluations by county committees. Specific guidelines are needed to evaluate feedlot pollution potential more objectively. Such guidelines would permit more efficient use of limited federal and state cost-sharing funds in reducing feedlot pollution.

Described here is a system for analyzing the pollution hazard from animal waste in any one of the approximately 90,000 feedlots in Minnesota (21). The system is impartial, simple, reasonably accurate, and based on current research data. It can easily be modified to fit local or regional conditions elsewhere.

Pollution indicators

Runoff from feedlots contains many pollutants, including disease-carrying organisms, other organic materials, nutrients, and suspended inorganic solids. These increase the concentrations of nutrients and suspended solids, and decrease the dissolved oxygen content of receiving water and in some cases threaten human health.

Two parameters represent the pollution hazard from feedlot runoff in our system, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and phosphorus (P). COD is a measure of the oxygen required to oxidize organic and oxidizable inorganic compounds in water. It thus indicates the degree of pollution in effluents. Phosphorus is a major contributor to eutrophication of surface …

Footnotes

  • R. A. Young is an agricultural engineer with the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Morris, Minnesota 56267, and an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul; M. A. Otterby, an agricultural engineer with Load King, CMI, in Elk Point, South Dakota 57025, formerly was a research fellow at the University of Minnesota; and Amos Roos is a senior engineer with the Division of Water Quality, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Roseville, 55113. This paper is a contribtion from the North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Morris, in cooperation with the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Science Journal Series No. 11,406.

  • Copyright 1982 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 37 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 37, Issue 1
January/February 1982
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A technique for evaluating feedlot pollution potential
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A technique for evaluating feedlot pollution potential
R. A. Young, M. A. Otterby, Amos Roos
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1982, 37 (1) 21-23;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
A technique for evaluating feedlot pollution potential
R. A. Young, M. A. Otterby, Amos Roos
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1982, 37 (1) 21-23;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society