ABSTRACT:
A comparison of land uses in Britain, Canada, and the United States between 1950/1951 and 1970/1971 indicated that, at the national scale, competition for land between agriculture and other land-using activities is stronger among rural land demands than urban land demands. But the national land use data failed to highlight conflicts among land uses involving prime agricultural land on a more local scale. The comparison of land uses suggested that the loss of prime agricultural land in Britain, Canada, and the United States is a local concern with national consequences. In this sense, national figures hide many of the more pressing problems of prime land loss because they fail to take into account the distributional characteristics of agricultural land with urban or other uses of land at the local scale.
Footnotes
John A. G. Hansen is an assistant professor in the University School of Rural Planning and Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1. Funding for this research was provided by the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851. The author thanks Dr. R. H. Best, who supervised the research.
- Copyright 1982 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.