Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis

Alan D. McQueen, Robert N. Shulstad and C. Tim Osborn
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 182-185;
Alan D. McQueen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert N. Shulstad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Tim Osborn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Soil loss could be reduced almost 25 percent in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed, from 4.2 tons per acre to 3.2 tons per acre, while increasing net returns to farmers from $83.94 per acre to $107.28 per acre by altering present cropping patterns. A prohibition on fall plowing would result in an average net return of $106.28 per acre and reduce average soil loss to 2.9 tons per acre. An average soil loss restriction would be the most cost-effective policy, exclusive of administrative costs. A restriction limiting soil loss from each acre to a maximum amount would be much more costly than a soil loss restriction that allows some acres to have a high loss and others a low loss but limits the average loss per acre for the entire watershed.

Footnotes

  • Alan D. McQueen and C. Tim Osborn are research assistants in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Arkansas. Fayetteville, 72701. Robert N. Shulstad is an associate professor and head of the department. This research was supported in part by a grant from the Arkansas Water Resources Research Center. Office of Water Resources Technology, U.S. Department of the Interior. Published with the approval of the director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experimental Station.

  • Copyright 1982 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 37 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May/June 1982
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis
Alan D. McQueen, Robert N. Shulstad, C. Tim Osborn
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 182-185;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis
Alan D. McQueen, Robert N. Shulstad, C. Tim Osborn
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 182-185;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Cropping system drives microbial community response to simulated climate change and plant inputs
  • Compost amendment to enhance carbon sequestration in rangelands
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society