Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Water stress of four windbreak tree species during soil drying

A. B. Frank
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 189-192;
A. B. Frank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Water relations for green ash, hackberry. American elm, and Siberian elm, trees used in windbreak plantings in the Northern Great Plains, were evaluated to determine response to increasing soil water deficits and to relate results to field observations on competition among trees and adjacent crops and to tree growth characteristics. Leaf water potentials of green ash and hackberry, in comparison with American and Siberian elm, declined at different rates during a 2-year field study. From the initial sample date (full leaf expansion) to the final sample date (leaves senescencing), leaf water potential dropped 30.1 bars for green ash and 27.9 bars for hackberry. These reductions compared with 10.1- and 6.2-bar-reductions for American and Siberian elm, respectively. In a controlled-environment chamber, transpiration rates at high soil water potentials (low water stress) were considerably higher for Siberian elm than for green ash and American elm. The higher water stress in leaves of green ash and hackberry contributes to early growth cessation and leaf drop during late summer, which should reduce total soil water use by the trees and leave more water for adjacent crops. If Siberian elm were selected for early leaf drop, it probably would initiate hardening processes earlier and have greater tolerance to winter injury and stress-related disease and insect attack.

Footnotes

  • A. B. Frank is a plant physiologist at the Northern Great Plains Research Center, Agriculture Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. P.O. Box 459, Mandan, North Dakota 58554.

  • Copyright 1982 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 37 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May/June 1982
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water stress of four windbreak tree species during soil drying
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water stress of four windbreak tree species during soil drying
A. B. Frank
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 189-192;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water stress of four windbreak tree species during soil drying
A. B. Frank
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1982, 37 (3) 189-192;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Cropping system drives microbial community response to simulated climate change and plant inputs
  • Compost amendment to enhance carbon sequestration in rangelands
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society