ABSTRACT:
The effects of two types of hiking boots on erosion of woodland trails was compared. Hikers wore conventional lug-soled boots or boots with a corrugated rubber compound sole. The trails were used at two intensities, 600 passes and 2,400 passes per plot at weekly intervals over a 6-week period. No significant differences between the two hiking boots were detected in comparisons of yields of organic matter and eroded soil from the plots. However, significant differences in yields were found in a comparison of hiking intensities. Differences in yields also occurred between all treatments and untreated plots under field conditions, which were controlled for slope, soil type, canopy cover, and overland runoff. Residual effects of hiking wear on these trails persisted 41 days (until onset of leaf fall) after hiking ceased.
Footnotes
Fred R. Kuss is an associate professor in the Department of Recreation, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742. This research was supported by funds provided by the U.S. Forest Service's Northeastern Forest Experiment Station; the National Park Service; the Quabaug Rubber Company, Brookfield, Massachusetts; and the L. L. Bean Company, Freeport, Maine.
- Copyright 1983 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.