Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Progress in no-till

Arnold D. King
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1983, 38 (3) 160-161;
Arnold D. King
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

Early American agriculturists often referred to soil mulching in their writings, but the technology was not practical at the time (3). Recent developments in equipment and chemicals have made conservation tillage the practice of choice for effective, economic erosion control. After decades of clean-till farming, the nation is on the brink of a revolution in crop production systems.

Evolution of tillage systems

Mechanization of agriculture in the United States accelerated during the 1930s. Increased tractor power and other technological developments contributed to wide acceptance of tillage systems based on the moldboard plow. Clean tillage interacting with intense wind and rain caused excessive soil erosion in the nation's major agricultural regions.

The disastrous Dust Bowl in the Great Plains was attributed to drought in the 1930s. Similar and even more severe droughts have occurred since, but Dust Bowl conditions have not recurred. Actually, the Dust Bowl was the result of inadequate agricultural technology. But this disastrous period in history did focus national attention on the soil erosion problem.

Progress in soil conservation was made before World War II, but food demand during the war encouraged plowouts of land unsuitable for crop production with the technology available. Clean cultivation …

Footnotes

  • Arnold D. King is an agronomist at the South National Technical Center, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Worth, Texas 76115.

  • Copyright 1983 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 38 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 38, Issue 3
May/June 1983
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Progress in no-till
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Progress in no-till
Arnold D. King
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1983, 38 (3) 160-161;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Progress in no-till
Arnold D. King
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 1983, 38 (3) 160-161;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society