Excerpt
I want to make two points. First, if you think you have problems in making soil conservation work in the United States, spare a thought for countries in the Third World, where the problems are much worse and the difficulties of applying the solutions are much greater. Second, you must get it right, because if soil conservation cannot be made to work effectively in the United States, with all the advantage of research, extension, and conservation services, plus wealthy, educated farmers on good land with a gentle climate—if with all these benefits conservation is not successful—then what hope is there for struggling countries that have few, or none, of these advantages?
Physical problems
The erosivity of rainfall From a number of studies around the world, we can get an approximate picture of erosivity. This information needs to be treated with caution for two reasons. First, most of the calculations are based on the erosivity (EI) index, and it is by no means certain that this empirical index, derived from U.S. data, is appropriate in other climates. Second, most of the studies were based on the old system (13) that exaggerates the erosivity of high-intensity …
Footnotes
Norman W. Hudson is the professor of field engineering, National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford, England MK45 4DT. This article is based on the Sixth H. Wayne Pritchard Lecture, which he delivered during SCSA's 38th annual meeting in Hartford, Connecticut.
- Copyright 1983 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.