ABSTRACT:
A quantitative comparison was made of the relationship between crop production input/output ratios and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Land Capability Classification System and the Storie Index on three study areas (22,000 acres) in California's San Joaquin Valley. When input and output data were aggregated for five crops (alfalfa, corn, cotton, sugar beets, and wheat) over three years, calculated input/output ratios were significantly lower for higher class lands (between capability classes 1 and 3) than lower class lands (between capability classes 3 and 6). Significant differences remained when reclamation of the farmland was accounted for. Storie indices between 60 and 100 had lower but statistically insignificant lower input/output ratios than indices less than 60, both before and after reclamation. The individual (disaggregated) crop data for alfalfa, corn, cotton, sugar beets, and wheat showed that land in the higher classes and with higher indices had lower input/output ratios more often than the lower rated soils (before and after reclamation). These data support the intuitive feeling of soil scientists and land managers that there is an economic rationale for protecting higher quality lands as opposed to depending on the conversion to agriculture of lower quality lands for food production.
Footnotes
John P. Reganold is a former graduate student and Michael J. Singer is an associate professor of soil science in the Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, 95616. Dr. Reganold is now an assistant professor in the Department of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State University, Pullman, 99164.
- Copyright 1984 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.