Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Water quality and the new farm policy initiatives

Clayton W. Ogg and Harry B. Pionke
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 1986, 41 (2) 85-88;
Clayton W. Ogg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harry B. Pionke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

WATER quality and soil conservation policy issues were, until recent years, considered apart from major farm policy issues. Now the 1985 farm bill, for the first time, links price support and other commodity program objectives to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's commitment to reduce soil erosion. Accelerated erosion, of course, poses a threat to both soil and water resources.

Because the highest rates of soil erosion generally occur on the most erodible cropland, one provision in the new farm bill denies federal price supports to farmers who plow out or “sodbust” highly erodible soils. Participants in certain commodity programs must also begin to implement plans by 1990 for protecting “highly erodible” soils or lose program benefits. And the 1984 conservation acreage reserve, which was substituted for acreage set-aside and crop diversion programs to protect some highly erodible lands, is expanded in the new farm bill to include 40 to 45 million of those highly erodible acres. To achieve program consistency, these initiatives focus nationwide on remedies for protecting highly erodible cropland, as do the “targeting” initiatives that have become part of soil conservation policy (2, 15).

A water quality perspective …

Footnotes

  • Clayton W. Ogg is an agricultural economist, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C. 20005–4788, and Harry B. Pionke is soil scientist and research leader, Northeast Watershed Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, University Park, Pennsylvania.

  • Copyright 1986 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 41 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 41, Issue 2
March/April 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water quality and the new farm policy initiatives
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water quality and the new farm policy initiatives
Clayton W. Ogg, Harry B. Pionke
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 1986, 41 (2) 85-88;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water quality and the new farm policy initiatives
Clayton W. Ogg, Harry B. Pionke
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 1986, 41 (2) 85-88;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society