Excerpt
CRITICS today often remark that soil conservation programs are not working. That contention bears too much truth for comfort among pioneer conservationists. Participants in the movement's early years know that programs bore fruit in the 1930s and 1940s and wonder why the current complexities of farming cannot be overcome. Such statements as “conservation programs are working now but in a different pattern than those in Bennett's days” or “the social, political, and economic setting today is more complex” are not very satisfying and only give basis to the need for innovation that will put the nation's conservation efforts back on track.
In a penetrating, constructive commentary, “The Leadership Crisis in Conservation Districts” (JSWC, September-October 1985, page 420), Peter Nowak proposed how to gain stronger local leadership for soil conservation. A central thesis of Nowak's position is that a farmer goes through a series of identifiable steps in reaching a conservation decision and, Nowak emphasized, “there are dramatic differences between Hugh Hammond Bennett's world and that of today.” In a socioeconomic sense, the two worlds are different. But in a relative sense …
Footnotes
Melville H. Cohee, 2682 CTH-MM, Oregon, Wisconsin 53575, started with the Soil Erosion Service, Coon Valley, Wisconsin, in 1933 and worked for the Soil Conservation Service in several key planning positions from its inception in 1935 until his retirement from the agency in 1965.
- Copyright 1986 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.