Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherDepartments

The SCSA view

A focal point for action

Maurice G. Cook
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1987, 42 (1) 2;
Maurice G. Cook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A focal point for action

Excerpt

THE Food Security Act of 1985 contains the strongest conservation provisions enacted in 50 years. Though some implementation rules are not final and strategies for fulfilling the legislative directive are not fully developed, the legislation will have far-reaching impacts.

The goal of the four major conservation elements in the act—conservation reserve, conservation compliance, sodbuster, and swampbuster—is to maintain the quality of our productive land while discouraging the conversion of wetlands and highly erodible land to use as cropland. This is a noble aim that deserves everyone's support and cooperation. Achieving the goal will not be easy. But we must work to that end and perhaps realize some benefits that were not perceived when the legislation was conceived initially.

For example, the act has brought visibility to conservation in the context of agricultural policy. Soil erosion and wetlands conversion now are talked about with commodity price supports and farm loans in congressional committee discussions and agricultural forums. This is important as we assess our long-range production capacity in terms of resource sustainability. It has encouraged renewed understanding and cooperation among federal agencies responsible for the administration of agricultural programs.

A corollary to this …

Footnotes

  • President.

  • Copyright 1987 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 42 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 42, Issue 1
January/February 1987
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The SCSA view
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The SCSA view
Maurice G. Cook
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1987, 42 (1) 2;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The SCSA view
Maurice G. Cook
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1987, 42 (1) 2;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Conservation in the 2002 farm bill: Centerpiece or after-thought
  • Canadian environmental sustainability report published
  • Visual Soil Assessment., Volumes 1–4
Show more Departments

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society