Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherDepartments

The SWCS view

Sustainability's promise

Richard Duesterhaus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1990, 45 (1) 4;
Richard Duesterhaus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Sustainability's promise

Excerpt

SUSTAINABILITY is a buzzword these days. We talk of sustainable forests, sustainable soils, sustainable agriculture, sustainable development-sustainable this and that. In reality, sustainability is not a new concept. Conservation pioneers from George Perkins Marsh to Gifford Pinchot and Aldo Leopold alluded to the concept in their writings, as did the founders of SWCS when they wrote in our mission statement that we would exist “to emphasize the interdependence of natural resources and thereby to educate people so they can use and enjoy these resources forever.”

But sustainability remains a buzzword. The question is how constructive a buzzword it proves to be.

Much time and effort has been spent in the agricultural conservation community over the past two or three years arguing about semantics. Which term better describes the concept of sustainability in an agricultural context? Is it simply “sustainable,” or “low-input,” or “low-input sustainable”? Or perhaps “alternative,” or “regenerative,” even “organic”?

SWCS contributed to this semantic wrangling a year ago in planning its national conference, “The Promise of Low-Input Agriculture: A Search for Sustainability and Profitability,” that was held in …

Footnotes

  • Copyright 1990 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 45 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 45, Issue 1
January/February 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The SWCS view
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The SWCS view
Richard Duesterhaus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 4;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The SWCS view
Richard Duesterhaus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 4;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Conservation in the 2002 farm bill: Centerpiece or after-thought
  • Canadian environmental sustainability report published
  • Visual Soil Assessment., Volumes 1–4
Show more Departments

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society