Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Farm price distortions, chemical use, and the environment

Clayton W. Ogg
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1990, 45 (1) 45-47;
Clayton W. Ogg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

CROP surpluses have constituted a persistent and conspicuous problem for U.S. agriculture. These surpluses appear to be particularly wasteful when they are caused by chemical inputs that pollute the environment. Past surpluses resulted in part from the encouragement of farm price support programs to increase application of chemicals and other nonland inputs. Initiatives during 1985 farm bill deliberations and, more recently, during negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade have focused on means toeliminate farm program influences on input use. More modest initiatives, undertaken in anticipation of the 1990 farm bill discussions, would reduce program influences over input use while preserving much of past price support program structures. The latter are stimulated partly by environmental and conservation concerns (2, 7).

Current programs and proposed policy options have several implications. Although some farm programs and water quality are in conflict, complementarities between farmers' goals and water quality also exist. Some options offered mainly to reduce price and resource use distortions could benefit both farmers and the environment.

Subsidies for a commodity or a production input raise profits, which can encourage firms to use more inputs, such as fertilizer or irrigation water, to produce more of the profitable …

Footnotes

  • Clayton W. Ogg is an economist with the Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460.

  • Copyright 1990 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 45 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 45, Issue 1
January/February 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Farm price distortions, chemical use, and the environment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Farm price distortions, chemical use, and the environment
Clayton W. Ogg
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 45-47;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Farm price distortions, chemical use, and the environment
Clayton W. Ogg
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 45-47;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society