Excerpt
MANY years ago, farming was different than other occupations. It was more a way of life than a business. Farmers were self-sufficient. They bought and sold little. They took to market only what was in excess of their family needs. Despite regional differences, there was a generally recognizable rural culture, tradition, and lifestyle. Farmers were readily distinguishable from other people by speech, dress, and manner.
Farmers were considered unique, and worthily so. They were given preference in the legislative forum. For example, because farmers were special, they were given preferred access to land and water. When general social legislation was enacted, we often excluded agriculture because of its uniqueness. Consider some of the major exclusions sought by and granted to agriculture:
▸ Exemption from a whole set of laws related to hired labor: child labor, working conditions, minimum wages, workmen's compensation, collective-bargaining rights, unemployment insurance.
▸ Preference with respect to determining rates for transportation of farm products.
▸ Exemption from laws regarding the restraint of trade granted to farm cooperatives.
These exclusions have now come under fire. Agriculture is being challenged on all of them, including price and income supports available to farmers, but not to …
Footnotes
Don Paarlberg is professor emeritus of agricultural economics at Purdue University, 1214 Hayes Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906.
- Copyright 1990 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.