Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Commodity programs and sustainable cash grain farming

Bruce E. Lyman, Richard A. Levins, Michael A. Schmitt and William F. Lazarus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1990, 45 (1) 86-87;
Bruce E. Lyman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Levins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Schmitt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William F. Lazarus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

REDWOOD County, in southwestern Minnesota, is primarily a cash grain-producing region. Corn is the predominant crop, with corn-soybeans the predominant rotation. Not surprisingly, the sign-up for government commodity programs is very high in Redwood County. Program payments have helped relieve the economic difficulties that plagued farmers throughout the 1980s. But looking to the coming decade, many farmers and farm leaders see economic issues making way for environmental issues as a major influence in agricultural decision-making.

Cash grain farmers in the area no doubt will be encouraged to adopt more sustainable farming practices. Two questions arise quite naturally from this. The first is simply, “What options do cash grain farmers have for becoming more sustainable?” The second concerns the incentives (or disincentives) that current commodity programs provide farmers who wish to become more sustainable.

After conducting a series of informal interviews with farmers in the county, we found that most cash grain farmers saw their options as being relatively limited. Furthermore, there was a consensus that straying from commodity program guidelines would be financially unwise, to say the least. One farmer talked of the “vise grip” in which programs held his farm planning …

Footnotes

  • Bruce E. Lyman is an extension associate, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho, Moscow 83843. Richard A. Levins is an associate professor and William F. Lazarus is an assistant professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, and Michael A. Schmitt is an assistant professor, Department of Soil Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 55108.

  • Copyright 1990 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 45 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 45, Issue 1
January/February 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Commodity programs and sustainable cash grain farming
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Commodity programs and sustainable cash grain farming
Bruce E. Lyman, Richard A. Levins, Michael A. Schmitt, William F. Lazarus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 86-87;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Commodity programs and sustainable cash grain farming
Bruce E. Lyman, Richard A. Levins, Michael A. Schmitt, William F. Lazarus
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1990, 45 (1) 86-87;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society