Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Pearl millet versus gin trash mulches for increasing soil water and cotton yields in a semiarid region

J. D. Bilbro and D. W. Fryrear
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1991, 46 (1) 66-69;
J. D. Bilbro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. W. Fryrear
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Gin trash and pearl millet stover were used as mulches in the blank rows of a two-planted, two-blank-row (1-m spacing) planting pattern (2×2) for rainfed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) over 4 years. Mulches were applied only one time, April 26, 1982. Gin trash was applied at rates of 7, 23, and 40 Mg/ha (3, 10, and 18 tons/acre), which gave soil coverages of about 30%, 80%, and 95%, respectively. Pearl millet was applied at rates of 10, 20, and 30 Mg/ha (4.5, 9, and 13.4 tons/acre); soil coverages of about 85%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. Check plots were not mulched. Effectiveness of the mulches was ascertained from soil water determinations and lint yields. In 1982, average lint yield on all mulched plots was 53% greater than that on check plots. Insufficient soil water in the planting zone precluded establishment of cotton in 1983 and 1984, but in 1985 cotton was established in the same plots that were used in 1982. Lint yields of mulched plon averaged 13% more than those of check plots. During the 4-year study, plots that had received the greatest amounts of mulch (essentially 100% ground cover initially) consistently had the most soil water. Millet-mulched plots consistently had more stored water than their gin trash counterparts. Producers should be able to significantly increase soil water storage and, hence, increase lint yields and reduce soil erosion losses by the consistent use of mulches of gin trash, millet stover, or comparable organic materials.

Footnotes

  • J. D. Bilbro is a research agronomist and D. W. Fryrear is an agricultural engineer with the Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 909, Big Spring, Texas 79721-0909.

  • Copyright 1991 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 46 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 46, Issue 1
January/February 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pearl millet versus gin trash mulches for increasing soil water and cotton yields in a semiarid region
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pearl millet versus gin trash mulches for increasing soil water and cotton yields in a semiarid region
J. D. Bilbro, D. W. Fryrear
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1991, 46 (1) 66-69;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Pearl millet versus gin trash mulches for increasing soil water and cotton yields in a semiarid region
J. D. Bilbro, D. W. Fryrear
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1991, 46 (1) 66-69;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
  • A framework to estimate climate mitigation potential for US cropland using publicly available data
  • Nitrate losses from Midwest US agroecosystems: Impacts of varied management and precipitation
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society