Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Why farmers adopt production technology

Overcoming impediments to adoption of crop residue management techniques will be crucial to implementation of conservation compliance plans

Pete Nowak
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1992, 47 (1) 14-16;
Pete Nowak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Overcoming impediments to adoption of crop residue management techniques will be crucial to implementation of conservation compliance plans

Excerpt

ANSWERING the question of why farmers adopt production technologies is elementary and apparent; new production technologies are adopted when the techniques are perceived as being in farmers' best interests. Almost everyone, farmers included, would agree with this basic premise. Yet disagreements arise when asking the more interesting and challenging question: Why don't farmers adopt new techniques, such as residue management systems?.

While disagreements exist, it is the answer to this latter question from which strategies must be built to help farmers make decisions that are economically, agronomically, and environmentally sound. Consequently, answers to the question of why farmers don't adopt must serve as the basis for increasing adoption. Efforts to increase the rate of adoption of residue management systems must be based on understanding why farmers reject new production techniques.

Reasons for nonadoption

Farmers do not adopt production technologies for two basic reasons: they are either unable or unwilling. These reasons are not mutually exclusive. Farmers can be able yet unwilling, willing but unable, and, of course, both unwilling and unable. These may sound like minor semantical distinctions, but the difference between a farmer being unwilling or unable is crucial when designing the appropriate remedial …

Footnotes

  • Pete Nowak is a professor in the Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706.

  • Copyright 1992 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 47 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 47, Issue 1
January/February 1992
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why farmers adopt production technology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Why farmers adopt production technology
Pete Nowak
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1992, 47 (1) 14-16;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Why farmers adopt production technology
Pete Nowak
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1992, 47 (1) 14-16;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Delivering on the potential of formal farmer networks: Insights from Indiana
  • Upper Midwest farmer perceptions: Too much uncertainty about impacts of climate change to justify changing current agricultural practices
  • Taking stock of voluntary nutrient management: Measuring and tracking change
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society