Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Legal commentary

Comments on Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council

James E. Holloway
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1993, 48 (1) 19;
James E. Holloway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Comments on Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council

Excerpt

On the last day of the most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision in the case of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (404 S.E. 2d 895). The Court held that the restrictions on Lucas' land were a regulatory taking that required compensation.

In 1984 David Lucas bought two vacant ocean-front lots in a residential subdivision. In 1988 the South Carolina legislature passed the Beachfront Management Act to limit construction within the beach/dune system in critical areas. The plaintiff's lots were in the critical area where the act prohibited construction of any permanent structure, except a small deck or walkway on the two lots.

Lucas sued the South Carolina Coastal Council. He asserted that the use restrictions on the lots denied him “economically viable use” of his land and thus was a regulatory taking of private property requiring just compensation. The lower court found a regulatory taking and awarded Lucas $1.2 million as just compensation.

The South Carolina Coastal Council appealed to the South Carolina Supreme Court, which determined, “the issue is whether governmental regulation of the use of property, in order to …

Footnotes

  • James E. Holloway is an associate professor of business law and Dr. Donald C. Guy is an associate professor of real estate in the Department of Finance, School of Business, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353.

  • Copyright 1993 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 48 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 48, Issue 1
January/February 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Legal commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Legal commentary
James E. Holloway
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1993, 48 (1) 19;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Legal commentary
James E. Holloway
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1993, 48 (1) 19;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society