Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Evaluating methods for measuring residue cover

S. J. Corak, T. C. Kaspar and D. W. Meek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 1993, 48 (1) 70-74;
S. J. Corak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. C. Kaspar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. W. Meek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

The percentage of soil surface covered with crop residue can be estimated from slide photographs using point sampling methods such as dot screens, but the accuracy of these methods is unknown. Our objective was to develop a benchmark method for accurately measuring residue cover. Slide photographs of residues were projected on the screen of a slide viewer, and tracings of residues were made on acetate film taped to the screen. We measured the area of tracings with computerized image analysis. Results were compared with those obtained by projection of slides onto dot screens, and by image analysis of videotaped pictures of real residues. Measurements made with dot screens and with image analysis of tracings were not significantly different. Image analysis of videotaped pictures underestimated residue cover because we were unable to discriminate completely between soil surface and crop residue based solely on gray-level. The tracing method, although time consuming, is useful for testing the accuracies of other residue-cover measurement methods.

Footnotes

  • S.J. Corak is a research associate in the Agronomy Department at Iowa State University, Ames, 50011. T.C. Kaspar is a plant physiologist and D.W. Meek is a mathematician at the USDA-ARS National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011. Joint contribution of USDA-ARS and Journal Paper No. J-14865 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. Project No. 2878. Ihe authors thank Heidi Brayton, Nancy Nubel, and Daniel Paulsen for their help with this project.

  • Copyright 1993 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 48 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 48, Issue 1
January/February 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating methods for measuring residue cover
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Evaluating methods for measuring residue cover
S. J. Corak, T. C. Kaspar, D. W. Meek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1993, 48 (1) 70-74;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Evaluating methods for measuring residue cover
S. J. Corak, T. C. Kaspar, D. W. Meek
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 1993, 48 (1) 70-74;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The adoption of conservation tillage practices in Oklahoma: Findings from a producer survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Carbon and nitrogen release from cover crop residues and implications for cropping systems management
  • Response of rainfall erosivity to changes in extreme precipitation in the Poyang Lake basin, China
  • Salt leaching process in coastal saline soil by infiltration of melting saline ice under field conditions
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society