Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Early experience with Pennsylvania's agricultural conservation easement program

Leigh J. Maynard, Timothy W. Kelsey, Stanford M. Lembeck and John C. Becker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation April 1998, 53 (2) 106-112;
Leigh J. Maynard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy W. Kelsey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanford M. Lembeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Becker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Purchase of conservation easements is becoming an increasingly common agricultural land preservation technique. This paper uses a survey of participants in Pennsylvania's agricultural conservation easement program to investigate the characteristics and attitudes of the initial easement sellers during the program's first three years. Demand for the program was found to be sensitive to development pressure. Participants were older on average than nonparticipating farmers. Debt reduction was the largest use of easement sale proceeds, followed by savings and farm capital purchases. Implications for current policy decision making and future evaluation of the program's effectiveness are discussed.

Footnotes

  • The authors are, respectively, graduate research assistant, associate professor, professor, and prfessor in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, 106 Armsby Building, University Park, PA 16802.

  • Copyright 1998 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 53 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 53, Issue 2
Second Quarter 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early experience with Pennsylvania's agricultural conservation easement program
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Early experience with Pennsylvania's agricultural conservation easement program
Leigh J. Maynard, Timothy W. Kelsey, Stanford M. Lembeck, John C. Becker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 1998, 53 (2) 106-112;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Early experience with Pennsylvania's agricultural conservation easement program
Leigh J. Maynard, Timothy W. Kelsey, Stanford M. Lembeck, John C. Becker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 1998, 53 (2) 106-112;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Carbon and nitrogen release from cover crop residues and implications for cropping systems management
  • Response of rainfall erosivity to changes in extreme precipitation in the Poyang Lake basin, China
  • Salt leaching process in coastal saline soil by infiltration of melting saline ice under field conditions
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society