Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherFeatures

Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines

A. C. Henry, D.A. Hosack, C. W. Johnson, D. Rol and G. Bentrup.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation October 1999, 54 (4) 645-650;
A. C. Henry Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.A. Hosack
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. W. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Rol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Bentrup.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

The landscape of rural America is changing. Wildlife habitats are being conversed to agricultural uses, corridors (linear patches that differ from their surroundings) are removed to expand fields, and urban development spreads across farms, forests, and prairies. The result is a fragmented landscape with fewer, smaller, less-connected patches of wildlife habitat and increasingly-degraded water quality that stresses aquatic ecosystems. The landscape's capacity to sustain a diversity of plant, animal, and aquatic species is declining at an accelerating rate. The loss of biodiversity has become a national concern. Land use planners are increasingly advocating the use of conservation corridors, including riparian buffers, windbreaks/shelterbelts, filter strips, field borders, and grassed waterways to improve water quality and wildlife habitat. Since many of the ecological functions of conservation corridors operate more efficiently at scales larger than an individual corridor, planning at the watershed scale offers the best opportunity to optimize these functions.

Footnotes

  • Albert C. Henry, Jr., is with the Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Watershed Science Institute at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.; Dennis A. Hosack is with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commision, Raleigh, N. C.; and Craig W. Johnson, Dick Rol, and Gary Bentrup are with the Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning at Utah State University, Logan, Utah. They acknowledge Dan Good, North Carolina NRCS, for providing Figures 1 and 2.

  • Copyright 1999 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 54 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 54, Issue 4
Fourth Quarter 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines
A. C. Henry, D.A. Hosack, C. W. Johnson, D. Rol, G. Bentrup.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Oct 1999, 54 (4) 645-650;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines
A. C. Henry, D.A. Hosack, C. W. Johnson, D. Rol, G. Bentrup.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Oct 1999, 54 (4) 645-650;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Managing weeds during wildflower meadow establishment in the arid Intermountain West: efficacy of a grass-first strategy for sites with heavy annual weed pressure
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society