Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Applicability of SCS curve number method for a California oak woodlands watershed

D. Lewis, M. J. Singer and K. W. Tate
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation April 2000, 55 (2) 226-230;
D. Lewis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. J. Singer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. W. Tate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 55 no. 2 226-230

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online January 1, 2000.

Copyright & Usage 
Copyright 2000 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. D. Lewis,
  2. M. J. Singer, and
  3. K. W. Tate

Article usage

Article usage: October 2008 to August 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 2008500
Nov 2008300
Dec 2008700
Jan 20092001
Feb 2009400
Mar 2009900
Apr 20091200
May 20091600
Jun 20092201
Jul 2009802
Aug 2009500
Sep 20091100
Oct 2009601
Nov 20091001
Dec 20092003
Jan 2010500
Feb 20101001
Mar 2010900
Apr 20103202
May 2010900
Jun 20101200
Jul 20101200
Aug 2010600
Sep 20101201
Oct 2010700
Nov 2010700
Dec 20101300
Jan 20111100
Feb 20111100
Mar 20111401
Apr 20111000
May 2011900
Jun 20111100
Jul 20111000
Aug 20111200
Sep 2011400
Oct 2011900
Nov 20112000
Dec 20111401
Jan 2012701
Feb 20121200
Mar 2012700
Apr 20121000
May 2012900
Jun 2012501
Jul 2012800
Aug 2012400
Sep 2012400
Oct 20121000
Nov 20121700
Dec 2012500
Jan 20131100
Feb 2013500
Mar 2013600
Apr 20131800
May 20131100
Jun 2013201
Jul 20131301
Aug 20131102
Sep 20131100
Oct 2013900
Nov 2013500
Dec 2013701
Jan 20141000
Feb 2014300
Mar 2014801
Apr 2014800
May 2014500
Jun 2014401
Jul 2014300
Aug 2014500
Sep 2014800
Oct 2014400
Nov 20141400
Dec 2014200
Jan 2015801
Feb 2015300
Mar 20151600
Apr 2015800
May 2015401
Jun 2015500
Jul 2015900
Aug 2015200
Sep 20152200
Oct 2015400
Nov 2015701
Dec 2015801
Jan 20161703
Feb 2016200
Mar 2016800
Apr 2016600
May 2016700
Jun 2016400
Jul 2016300
Aug 2016200
Sep 20161400
Oct 2016500
Nov 2016400
Dec 20161001
Jan 2017800
Feb 2017500
Mar 2017700
Apr 2017900
May 20171900
Jun 2017801
Jul 2017600
Aug 20171203
Sep 2017402
Oct 2017800
Nov 2017901
Dec 2017600
Jan 2018901
Feb 2018800
Mar 2018400
May 20181000
Jun 20181100
Jul 20181101
Aug 2018400
Sep 2018300
Oct 2018600
Nov 2018400
Dec 2018400
Jan 2019600
Feb 2019800
Mar 2019300
May 2019200
Jun 2019200
Jul 2019200
Aug 2019800
Sep 2019500
Oct 2019201
Nov 2019200
Dec 2019200
Jan 2020200
Feb 2020800
Mar 2020300
Apr 2020701
May 20202700
Jun 2020200
Jul 2020400
Aug 20201800
Sep 2020600
Oct 20201200
Nov 20201800
Dec 2020700
Jan 2021900
Feb 20211400
Mar 2021700
Apr 20211100
May 20211200
Jun 2021600
Jul 2021300
Aug 20211700
Sep 20211700
Oct 2021500
Nov 2021601
Dec 2021900
Jan 2022300
Feb 20221400
Mar 20221700
Apr 20223200
May 20221600
Jun 2022500
Jul 20221300
Aug 20221300

Cited By...

  • 15 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 55 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 55, Issue 2
Second Quarter 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Applicability of SCS curve number method for a California oak woodlands watershed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Applicability of SCS curve number method for a California oak woodlands watershed
D. Lewis, M. J. Singer, K. W. Tate
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 2000, 55 (2) 226-230;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Applicability of SCS curve number method for a California oak woodlands watershed
D. Lewis, M. J. Singer, K. W. Tate
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 2000, 55 (2) 226-230;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing manure and inorganic nitrogen fertilization impacts on soil health, crop productivity, and crop quality in a continuous maize agroecosystem
  • Effect of sludge amino acid–modified magnetic coal gasification slag on plant growth, metal availability, and soil enzyme activity
  • Automatic identification of soil and water conservation measures from centimeter-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society