Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Comparison of profit maximization and multiple criteria models for selecting farming systems

T. Prato and S. Hajkowicz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2001, 56 (1) 52-55;
T. Prato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Hajkowicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

The rationale for subsidizing soil and water conservation practices is that farmers would not adopt farming systems incorporating these practices to the extent desired by society without cost sharing subsidies. Premises underlying this rationale are that profit maximization is the sole criterion for selecting farming systems and farming systems incorporating soil and water conservation practices are less profitable than systems that exclude these practices. Validity of the profit maximization model is evaluated by comparing the selection of farming systems based on profit maximization and a general multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model. Preferences for criteria were obtained from a survey of 20 farmers in Missouri's Goodwater Creek watershed. The MCDM model was used to evaluate five farming systems in terms of five economic and environmental criteria: increasing net return (profit), reducing economic risk, reducing soil erosion, improving drinking water quality, and enhancing aquatic ecosystems. Three method were used to estimate the weights for the criteria: fixed point scoring, paired comparisons, and judgment analysis. Weights represent farmers' preferences for the five criteria. Values of the five criteria are determined using a watershed simulation model. Weighs and values for the criteria are used to calculate utility scores, which are then used to rank the five farming systems. The top ranked and most profitable farming systems are different. Three possible interpretations of this discrepancy and their implications for conservation subsidies are discussed.

Footnotes

  • Tony Prato is professor of Resource Economics and Management and co-director of the Center for Agricultural, Resource, and Environmental Systems at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Stefan Hajkowicz is an environmental policy analyst in the Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Copyright 2001 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 56 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 56, Issue 1
First Quarter 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of profit maximization and multiple criteria models for selecting farming systems
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of profit maximization and multiple criteria models for selecting farming systems
T. Prato, S. Hajkowicz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2001, 56 (1) 52-55;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comparison of profit maximization and multiple criteria models for selecting farming systems
T. Prato, S. Hajkowicz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2001, 56 (1) 52-55;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Automatic identification of soil and water conservation measures from centimeter-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery
  • Evaluating effects of dairy manure application method on soil health and nitrate
  • Carbon and nitrogen release from cover crop residues and implications for cropping systems management
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society