Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Effects of peanut cropping practices and canopy cover conditions on runoff and sediment yield

C. C. Truman and R.G. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation April 2001, 56 (2) 152-159;
C. C. Truman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.G. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Runoff and sediment yields were measured from eight field plots (40 m2) over a three year period to determine the effect of peanut cropping practices and canopy cover conditions on runoff and sediment loss. Plots were located on a Tifton loamy sand, and were exposed to four 30 min simulated rainfall sequences (I =63.5 mm h−1) four to eight times per growing season. Runoff and sediment losses were measured from four soil cover conditions: continuous fallow, bare bedded single row peanuts (Arachis hypogea L), and twin row peanuts (2 and 4 peanut rows per 2 m wide bed). Percent Cover (PC) and leaf area index (LAI) increased to a maximum then leveled off as plants matured or were harvested. PC for single and twin row peanuts was related to days since planting (DSP) (r =0.96 for single row peanuts and r =0.98 for twin row peanuts). LAI values for single and twin row peanuts were related to PC (r =0.98 for single row peanuts and r =0.94 for twin row peanuts). Single and twin row peanut plots had as much as eight times less runoff and as much as 63 times less sediment loss than continuous fallow or bare bedded plots. Twin row peanut plots had as much as three times less runoff and sediment loss than single row peanut plots. Sequence-based erodibility values calculated from continuous fallow plots (KFC) and bare bedded plots (KBB) ranged from 4–24 (3 yr mean =11.3, s.d. = 5.3) and 2–36 kg ha h MJ ha−1 mm−1 (3 yr mean =12.9, s.d. =11.6), respectively. Soil loss ratios (SLR) ranged from 0.01–2.61. SLRs decreased to a low far cropstage 3 when percent canopy cover was greatest (DSP = 81–107), then increased as peanut plants matured or were harvested Results show how management practices, such as twin row peanuts, can maximize peanut canopy development early in the growing season and minimize the time in which bare soil is vulnerable to a runoff producing rainstorm, thus reducing runoff and soil loss and conserving valuable natural resources.

Footnotes

  • Clinton C. Truman is a soil scientist and Randy G. Williams is an agricultural engineer with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service in the Southeast Watershed Research Luboratory, Tifton, Georgia.

  • Copyright 2001 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 56 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 56, Issue 2
Second Quarter 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of peanut cropping practices and canopy cover conditions on runoff and sediment yield
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effects of peanut cropping practices and canopy cover conditions on runoff and sediment yield
C. C. Truman, R.G. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 2001, 56 (2) 152-159;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Effects of peanut cropping practices and canopy cover conditions on runoff and sediment yield
C. C. Truman, R.G. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Apr 2001, 56 (2) 152-159;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Water, sediment, and metolachlor transport differences between wide- and narrow-row cotton production systems
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
  • A framework to estimate climate mitigation potential for US cropland using publicly available data
  • Nitrate losses from Midwest US agroecosystems: Impacts of varied management and precipitation
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society