Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Design and management of edge-of-field water control structures for ecological benefits

F. D. Shields, P. C. Smiley and C. M. Cooper
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2002, 57 (3) 151-157;
F. D. Shields Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. C. Smiley Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. M. Cooper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Stream channel incision often triggers formation of tributary gullies. These gullies erode and extend into fields, generating sediments that pollute downstream waters and degrade aquatic habitats. Standard practice for gully treatment involves damming using an earthen embankment with drainage provided by an L-shaped metal pipe. To date, thousands of these structures, also known as drop pipes, have been constructed in riparian zones adjacent to agricultural areas, but environmental criteria have played no role in design. Sixteen drop pipe sites (defined as the region of temporary or permanent impoundment created by the structure) in northwestern Mississippi were sampled for fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals; and physical habitat characteristics were assessed by sampling vegetation and surveying site topography. Speciose sites (those yielding 65 to 82 vertebrate species) were relatively large [⩾ 0.09 ha (.22 ac)], with a significant pool area. Depauperate sites (only 11 to 20 species captured) were smaller, with no pool area and little woody vegetation. Considerable environmental benefits could be realized by slightly modified design and management of drop pipe structures. Results of this study suggest habitat benefits are minimal for sites smaller than 0.1 ha (0.2 ac), for sites lacking woody vegetation, and for sites that do not have at least 20% of their area below the inlet weir elevation.

Footnotes

  • Fletcher Douglas Shields, Jr. is research hydraulic engineer at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, Peter Canfield Smiley is graduate research assistant in the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, and Charles Morris Cooper is supervisory research ecologist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi.

  • Copyright 2002 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 57 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 57, Issue 3
May/June 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Design and management of edge-of-field water control structures for ecological benefits
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Design and management of edge-of-field water control structures for ecological benefits
F. D. Shields, P. C. Smiley, C. M. Cooper
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2002, 57 (3) 151-157;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Design and management of edge-of-field water control structures for ecological benefits
F. D. Shields, P. C. Smiley, C. M. Cooper
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2002, 57 (3) 151-157;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of economic and climatic factors on agricultural water use in arid regions
  • Sediment delivery ratios from forest road networks and harvesting operational features by physiographic region in the southeastern United States
  • Gully erosion susceptibility prediction in Mollisols using machine learning models
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society