Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Modification and performance of the Coshocton wheel with the modified drop-box weir

J. V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2002, 57 (6) 364-372;
J. V. Bonta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Water-chemistry, sediment, and runoff data from erosion plots and small watersheds are often needed for erosion and water-quality studies where sediment concentrations can be large. Data may also be needed under conditions where approach channels are not appropriate for conventional measuring devices, such as in steep and skewed channels. The performance (sampler fraction) of the modified drop-box weir as the approach to the Coshocton wheel proportional water sampler was evaluated to meet these needs. Three splash-shield configurations on the sampling slot of the Coshocton wheel were investigated to control splashing of water and duplicate water sampling. Of the three shields, a dual-splash shield was required to control water splashing below the sampling slot and to insure proportional sampling of large flows. The Coshocton wheel worked well with the drop-box weir as the sampler approach under steady and unsteady flow conditions. The average proportional sampler fraction for the dual-shield configuration under steady flows was 0.0127 and for unsteady flows was 0.0120. This difference was not statistically significant. Coshocton wheel rotational speed was regular and increased with flow rate to about 35 rpm. After that, rotation became irregular, and the wheel stalled. No difference was found in a maximum-depth-of-flow parameter needed for sizing a drop-box weir based on sampler performance, compared with the parameter determined by performance of the drop-box weir alone (i.e., the wheel sampled proportionally at 100% of the design flow for the weir). This study extends the utility of the combined drop-box weir and Coshocton wheel system to steep and skewed channels.

Footnotes

  • James V. Bonta is a research hydraulic engineer with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed in Coshocton, Ohio.

  • Copyright 2002 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 57 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 57, Issue 6
November/December 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modification and performance of the Coshocton wheel with the modified drop-box weir
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Modification and performance of the Coshocton wheel with the modified drop-box weir
J. V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2002, 57 (6) 364-372;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Modification and performance of the Coshocton wheel with the modified drop-box weir
J. V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2002, 57 (6) 364-372;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Measuring edge-of-field water quality: Where we have been and the path forward
  • Field-scale evaluation of a multislot passive sampler
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Benefits, barriers, and use of cover crops in the western United States: Regional survey results
  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society