Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherA Section

Remote sensing changing natural resource management

Chris J. Johannsen, Gary W. Petersen, Paul G. Carter and Mark T. Morgan
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2003, 58 (2) 42A-45A;
Chris J. Johannsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary W. Petersen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul G. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark T. Morgan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

A major fear is that the remote sensing technology might be over sold. This happened in the 1970s when people were told that they would be able to detect diseases, nitrogen deficiencies, and many other stresses—all which proved false or inconsistent. But the conditions for applying remote sensing to natural resource management are now greatly improved. The improvements have come through advances in sensor technology, as well as dramatic improvements in computer hardware and software, and the ability to rapidly transfer data between remote locations. We must realize however, that we are dealing with complex technologies that require specialized training and patience for achieving success in real applications.

What is remote sensing?

Let's look at what can be done with this new remote sensing technology. Using aircraft sensors to provide data, we have been able to map field boundaries, locate stressed vegetation, and detect unusual conditions within experimental sites and on farmer production fields. Remotely sensed data are also useful in helping to define management units. Areas with similar responses within a field can be identified and sampled together. This directed sampling approach could replace typical grid sampling techniques that disregard soil variability. ...

Footnotes

  • CHRIS J. JOHANNSEN is a professor of agronomy at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. GARY W. PETERSEN is a distinguished professor of Soil and Land Resources at Penn State University in University Park, Pennsylvania. PAUL G. CARTER is a geospatial extension specialist at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, North Dakota. MARK T. MORGAN is an associate professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Agricultural Research Program publication #17086, Purdue University.

  • Copyright 2003 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 58 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 58, Issue 2
March-April 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Remote sensing changing natural resource management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Remote sensing changing natural resource management
Chris J. Johannsen, Gary W. Petersen, Paul G. Carter, Mark T. Morgan
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2003, 58 (2) 42A-45A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Remote sensing changing natural resource management
Chris J. Johannsen, Gary W. Petersen, Paul G. Carter, Mark T. Morgan
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2003, 58 (2) 42A-45A;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Advancing understanding of conservation practices on rented land
  • Leading at the edge: A roadmap to advance edge of field practices in agriculture
  • Mapping the Soil Vulnerability Index across broad spatial extents to guide conservation efforts
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society