Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health

T. A. Ward, K. W. Tate, E. R. Atwill, D. F. Lile, D. L. Lancaster, N. McDougald, S. Barry, R. S. Ingram, H. A. George, W. Jensen, W. E. Frost, R. Phillips, G. G. Markegard and S. Larson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2003, 58 (2) 83-88;
T. A. Ward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. W. Tate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. R. Atwill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. F. Lile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. L. Lancaster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. McDougald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Barry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. S. Ingram
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. A. George
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Jensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. E. Frost
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. G. Markegard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Larson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Visual assessments are integral components of several widely promoted efforts to assess the health of stream and riparian areas across the Nation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet (HAFDS), U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Stream Visual Assessment (SVA), and U.S. Department of Interior (USDI) Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Proper Functioning Condition (PFC) assessment were applied to 234 rangeland riparian areas to determine: 1) how well the assessments correlate, and 2) how site-specific stream and riparian characteristics affect the outcome of each assessment and thus the comparison of outcomes across stream types. Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet and Stream Visual Assessment are habitat driven assessments, which target similar parameters resulting in a strong positive correlation between these methods (r = 0.81). BLM's Proper Functioning Condition focuses on parameters related to hydrologic function, thus a weaker correlation was found when comparing Proper Functioning Condition to the Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet and the NRCS' Stream Visual Assessment methods (r = 0.58 and 0.54, respectively). A combination of one habitat assessment and Proper Functioning Condition should be utilized to conduct a comprehensive assessment of riparian/stream health. Site characteristics, which were significantly associated with assessment outcomes included entrenchment ratio, substrate size, channel width to depth and slope. This presents a problem in that comparison of assessment outcomes across different streams and stream reaches are confounded by factors such as slope and substrate type, which may not always be indicative of riparian/stream health. The Rusgen Stream Morphology Classification system was used to successfully control for the effect of these site-specific effects on assessment outcome, allowing for comparison of riparian/stream health assessments across streams.

Footnotes

  • Theresa A. Ward is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Stanislaus/San Joaquin Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Modesto, California. Kenneth W. Tate is an extension rangeland watershed specialist in the Department of Agronomy and Range Science at the University of California, in Davis, California. Edward R. Atwill is an associate veterinarian and associate specialist in the Department of Population Health and Reproduction at the University of California, in Tulare, California. David F. Lile is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Lassen County University of California Cooperative Extension in Susanville, California. Don L. Lancaster is an extension advisor with the Modoc County University of California Cooperative in Alturas, California. Neil McDougald is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Madera/Fresno Counties University of California County Cooperative Extension in Madera California. Sheila Barry is a Bay Area natural resource advisor with the University of California Cooperative Extension in San Jose, California. Roger S. Ingram is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Nevada/Placer Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Auburn, California. Holly A. George is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Plumas/Sierra Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Quincy, California. Wayne Jensen is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the San Luis Obispo/Santa Barbara Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Santa Maria, California. William E. Frost is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the El Dorado County University of California Cooperative Extension in Placerville, California. Ralph Phillips is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Kern County University of California Cooperative Extension in Bakersfield, California. Gary G. Markegard is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Humboldt/Del Norte Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Eureka, California. Stephanie Larson is a livestock/natural resource advisor with the Sonoma/Marin Counties University of California Cooperative Extension in Santa Rosa, California.

  • Copyright 2003 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 58 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 58, Issue 2
March-April 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health
T. A. Ward, K. W. Tate, E. R. Atwill, D. F. Lile, D. L. Lancaster, N. McDougald, S. Barry, R. S. Ingram, H. A. George, W. Jensen, W. E. Frost, R. Phillips, G. G. Markegard, S. Larson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2003, 58 (2) 83-88;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health
T. A. Ward, K. W. Tate, E. R. Atwill, D. F. Lile, D. L. Lancaster, N. McDougald, S. Barry, R. S. Ingram, H. A. George, W. Jensen, W. E. Frost, R. Phillips, G. G. Markegard, S. Larson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2003, 58 (2) 83-88;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society