Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Simulation of the impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in southwestern Oklahoma under dry, average, and wet climatic conditions

M.W. Van Liew, J.D. Garbrecht and J.G. Arnold
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2003, 58 (6) 340-348;
M.W. Van Liew
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.D. Garbrecht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.G. Arnold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 58 no. 6 340-348

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online November 1, 2003.

Copyright & Usage 
Copyright 2003 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. M.W. Van Liew,
  2. J.D. Garbrecht, and
  3. J.G. Arnold

Article usage

Article usage: October 2008 to August 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 2008400
Nov 2008300
Dec 2008600
Jan 2009500
Feb 2009100
Mar 2009800
Apr 2009500
May 2009401
Jun 2009700
Jul 2009501
Aug 2009100
Sep 2009600
Oct 2009601
Nov 20091806
Dec 2009700
Jan 2010400
Feb 2010500
Mar 2010500
Apr 2010803
May 2010900
Jun 2010200
Jul 2010100
Aug 20101601
Sep 2010801
Oct 2010401
Nov 20101000
Dec 2010900
Jan 20111400
Feb 2011800
Mar 20112500
Apr 2011300
May 20112200
Jun 20111400
Jul 20111100
Aug 2011400
Sep 20111100
Oct 2011600
Nov 20111000
Dec 20111800
Jan 20121400
Feb 20121600
Mar 20122400
Apr 20122400
May 20123002
Jun 20122603
Jul 20121600
Aug 20121501
Sep 20122700
Oct 20123401
Nov 20121601
Dec 20122800
Jan 20131500
Feb 20131803
Mar 20132102
Apr 20132100
May 20131201
Jun 20131201
Jul 2013902
Aug 2013903
Sep 20131000
Oct 20132002
Nov 20131600
Dec 20132200
Jan 20141100
Feb 20141801
Mar 2014800
Apr 20142400
May 2014700
Jun 2014700
Jul 20141700
Aug 20141200
Sep 20141700
Oct 20142001
Nov 20141800
Dec 20141900
Jan 20151600
Feb 2015200
Mar 20151300
Apr 20151500
May 20151800
Jun 2015800
Jul 20151301
Aug 20151000
Sep 20151000
Oct 20151401
Nov 20151000
Dec 20152100
Jan 20161700
Feb 20162101
Mar 20162403
Apr 2016900
May 20161201
Jun 2016500
Jul 20161500
Aug 20161200
Sep 20161701
Oct 2016701
Nov 20161000
Dec 20161501
Jan 20171600
Feb 2017800
Mar 20171500
Apr 20171200
May 20172402
Jun 20171600
Jul 2017300
Aug 2017700
Sep 2017700
Oct 2017900
Nov 20171602
Dec 2017600
Jan 20181501
Feb 20181300
Mar 20181401
Apr 2018900
May 20181700
Jun 20181501
Jul 20181000
Aug 2018300
Sep 2018800
Oct 2018401
Nov 2018901
Dec 2018200
Jan 2019600
Feb 2019400
Mar 2019400
Apr 2019400
May 2019901
Jun 20191001
Jul 20191100
Aug 20191900
Sep 20191000
Oct 2019801
Nov 2019900
Dec 2019600
Jan 2020900
Feb 20201602
Mar 2020400
Apr 2020300
May 2020100
Jun 20202200
Jul 2020700
Aug 20201201
Sep 2020801
Oct 2020400
Nov 20203500
Dec 2020401
Jan 20211201
Feb 20211200
Mar 20211202
Apr 2021600
May 2021200
Jun 20211300
Jul 2021500
Aug 2021700
Sep 20211400
Oct 20211400
Nov 2021800
Dec 2021600
Jan 2022600
Feb 20221200
Mar 20221300
Apr 20222100
May 2022800
Jun 2022400
Jul 2022400
Aug 2022200

Cited By...

  • 20 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 58 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 58, Issue 6
November/December 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simulation of the impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in southwestern Oklahoma under dry, average, and wet climatic conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Simulation of the impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in southwestern Oklahoma under dry, average, and wet climatic conditions
M.W. Van Liew, J.D. Garbrecht, J.G. Arnold
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2003, 58 (6) 340-348;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Simulation of the impacts of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in southwestern Oklahoma under dry, average, and wet climatic conditions
M.W. Van Liew, J.D. Garbrecht, J.G. Arnold
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2003, 58 (6) 340-348;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An overview of research into conservation practice effects on soil and water resources in the Upper Washita Basin, Oklahoma, United States
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River Basin
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework toolbox in a Southern Piedmont landscape of the United States
  • Soil erodibility after the removal of wood chip mulch: A wind tunnel experiment
  • Ecosystem services in Iowa agricultural catchments: Hypotheses for scenarios with water quality wetlands and improved tile drainage
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society