Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherA Section

The 2007 farm bill

Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2004, 59 (1) 4A;
Craig A. Cox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

The 2002 farm bill is not even two years old and already conversations are starting about the 2007 bill. That makes sense because the stakes for conservationists will be high. It pays to be prepared. I was asked recently to speculate about what conservationists may face as the farm bill comes up for reauthorization in 2007.1 started by looking for clues in what happened in 2002.

The first and by far the most important clue for 2007 is the coming of age of the environmental agenda in U.S. agricultural conservation policy. For five decades, two purposes dominated public investment in working land conservation: (1) improving agricultural productivity and (2) sustaining the resource base for agricultural production. The environmental benefits from our work were real—reducing damage from sediment and flooding—but they were the icing on the cake. The cake was improved, sustained productivity.

In 2002, policymakers made a fundamental shift in priority from productivity and resource conservation to environmental quality. They drove home that shift in purpose with massive increases in funding for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program-formerly the Agricultural Conservation Program. The environmental agenda is now the cake, not the icing.

The second striking thing …

Footnotes

  • Craig A. Cox, executive director for the Soil and Water Conservation Society since 1998.

  • Copyright 2004 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 59 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 59, Issue 1
January/February 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The 2007 farm bill
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The 2007 farm bill
Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2004, 59 (1) 4A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The 2007 farm bill
Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2004, 59 (1) 4A;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
  • Climate change impacts on soil, water, and biodiversity conservation
  • The urgent need for action
Show more A Section

Homefront

  • Conservation practice and global climate change
  • Reflections on 2010 International Annual Conference
  • Resource management complexity: Then and now
Show more Homefront

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society