Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Willingness to pay for green space preservation: A comparison of soil and water conservation district clientele and the general public using the contingent valuation method

T.W. Blaine and F.R. Lichtkoppler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2004, 59 (5) 203-208;
T.W. Blaine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F.R. Lichtkoppler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 59 no. 5 203-208

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online September 1, 2004.

Copyright & Usage 
Copyright 2004 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. T.W. Blaine and
  2. F.R. Lichtkoppler

Article usage

Article usage: October 2008 to January 2021

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 2008900
Nov 2008300
Dec 2008300
Jan 2009500
Feb 2009800
Mar 20091301
Apr 2009700
May 2009900
Jun 2009300
Jul 2009303
Aug 2009200
Sep 2009801
Oct 20091700
Nov 20091701
Dec 20091101
Jan 2010801
Feb 20101500
Mar 20101400
Apr 20101402
May 20101101
Jun 20102001
Jul 20101400
Aug 2010500
Sep 20102401
Oct 20101100
Nov 2010800
Dec 2010701
Jan 20112300
Feb 20111400
Mar 20111100
Apr 20111100
May 2011801
Jun 20112000
Jul 2011800
Aug 20111300
Sep 2011500
Oct 20111500
Nov 20111700
Dec 20111401
Jan 20122103
Feb 20121404
Mar 20121101
Apr 20122000
May 20121000
Jun 2012600
Jul 20121201
Aug 2012900
Sep 20121800
Oct 20121800
Nov 20121201
Dec 2012800
Jan 20131101
Feb 20131001
Mar 20132800
Apr 20131600
May 20131700
Jun 2013403
Jul 2013300
Aug 2013201
Sep 2013700
Oct 20131001
Nov 20131000
Dec 20131000
Jan 2014600
Feb 2014400
Mar 20141601
Apr 20141200
May 2014500
Jun 2014800
Jul 2014600
Aug 2014500
Sep 2014700
Oct 20142200
Nov 20141202
Dec 20142100
Jan 20151201
Feb 2015500
Mar 20151100
Apr 20151500
May 2015800
Jun 20151400
Jul 20151000
Aug 2015702
Sep 2015901
Oct 20152000
Nov 2015600
Dec 2015900
Jan 20161100
Feb 20161100
Mar 2016301
Apr 20164400
May 2016600
Jun 2016100
Jul 2016500
Aug 2016500
Sep 20161300
Oct 2016500
Nov 20161001
Dec 2016302
Jan 2017900
Feb 2017510
Mar 20171100
Apr 2017700
May 20172432
Jun 2017600
Jul 2017900
Aug 2017200
Sep 2017601
Oct 2017500
Nov 20171201
Dec 2017400
Jan 20181201
Feb 20181101
Mar 2018500
Apr 2018200
May 2018500
Jun 2018301
Jul 2018700
Aug 2018701
Sep 2018601
Oct 2018900
Nov 2018900
Dec 2018100
Feb 20191200
Mar 2019800
Apr 20191201
May 2019900
Jun 2019600
Jul 2019500
Aug 20191200
Oct 2019100
Nov 2019400
Dec 2019300
Jan 20201000
Feb 2020400
Mar 2020100
Apr 2020500
May 2020500
Jun 20201502
Jul 2020802
Aug 20201000
Sep 2020300
Oct 2020900
Nov 20201900
Dec 2020800
Jan 2021700

Cited By...

  • 10 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 59 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 59, Issue 5
September/October 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Willingness to pay for green space preservation: A comparison of soil and water conservation district clientele and the general public using the contingent valuation method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Willingness to pay for green space preservation: A comparison of soil and water conservation district clientele and the general public using the contingent valuation method
T.W. Blaine, F.R. Lichtkoppler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2004, 59 (5) 203-208;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Willingness to pay for green space preservation: A comparison of soil and water conservation district clientele and the general public using the contingent valuation method
T.W. Blaine, F.R. Lichtkoppler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2004, 59 (5) 203-208;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Factors affecting natural resource conservation investments of residents in the Lower Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sources of sediments during rainfall in the dry-hot valley region of China on a small watershed scale
  • The effects of soil aeration prior to dairy manure application on edge-of-field hydrology and nutrient fluxes in cold climate hayland agroecosystems
  • Effect of soil and water conservation measures on the reduction of runoff and sediment load in a loess hilly-gully region
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society