Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherA Section

The length we go

Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices

Maurice J. Mausbach and Allen R. Dedrick
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2004, 59 (5) 96A-103A;
Maurice J. Mausbach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen R. Dedrick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices

Excerpt

Conservation practices are designed to reduce losses of soil, nutrients, pesticides, pathogens, and other biological and chemical materials from agricultural lands, conserve natural resources, enhance the quality of the agro-ecosystem, and enhance wildlife habitat. The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002—referred to as the 2002 farm bill—substantially increased funding levels of conservation programs—up nearly 80 percent above the level set for conservation under the 1996 farm bill. While it is widely recognized that these conservation programs will protect millions of acres, the environmental benefits have not previously been quantified for reporting at the national scale. Moreover, while an extensive body of literature exists on the effects of conservation practices at the field level, there are few research studies designed to measure the larger effects.

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) are working together on the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practice at the national and watershedscales as a measure for how the money being spent is meeting the goals.

CEAP is an on-going mix of data collection, model development, model application, and research. One of the goals is to dovelop the …

Footnotes

  • Maurice J. Mausbach is the deputy chief for the Soil Survey and Resource Assessment at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service in Washington, D.C. Allen R. Dedrick is the deputy administrator for the Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems in Bellsville, Maryland.

  • Copyright 2004 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 59 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 59, Issue 5
September/October 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The length we go
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The length we go
Maurice J. Mausbach, Allen R. Dedrick
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2004, 59 (5) 96A-103A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The length we go
Maurice J. Mausbach, Allen R. Dedrick
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2004, 59 (5) 96A-103A;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States
  • An overview of research into conservation practice effects on soil and water resources in the Upper Washita Basin, Oklahoma, United States
  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • Conservation tillage effects in the Atlantic Coastal Plain: An APEX examination
  • Surface runoff in Beasley Lake watershed: Effect of land management practices in a Lower Mississippi River Basin watershed
  • Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression
  • Making conservation count: The importance of assessing resources and documenting outcomes to USDA
  • STEWARDS: A decade of increasing the impact of Agricultural Research Service watershed research programs
  • Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • Impact of the Agricultural Research Service Watershed Assessment Studies on the Conservation Effects Assessment Project Cropland National Assessment
  • Impact of weather and climate scenarios on conservation assessment outcomes
  • Response of reservoir atrazine concentrations following regulatory and management changes
  • Impact of land use patterns and agricultural practices on water quality in the Calapooia River Basin of western Oregon
  • Conservation practices to mitigate and adapt to climate change
  • Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change
  • Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale
  • Crop residue is a key for sustaining maximum food production and for conservation of our biosphere
  • The evaluation of conservation practice placement in the Little River Experimental Watershed using geographic information systems
  • Sustaining the Earth's Watersheds-Agricultural Research Data System: Data development, user interaction, and operations management
  • The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
  • Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio
  • Communicating Conservation Effects Assessment Project results
  • Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • Climate and pest interactions pose a cross-landscape management challenge to soil and water conservation
  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society