Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Field evaluation of three phosphorus indices on new application sites in Texas

R.D. Harmel, H.A. Torbert, P.B. DeLaune, B.E. Haggard and R.L. Haney
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2005, 60 (1) 29-42;
R.D. Harmel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.A. Torbert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.B. DeLaune
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.E. Haggard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.L. Haney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Phosphorus (P) indices were developed to address nonpoint source P losses from agricultural fields; however, only limited information on P index performance at the field- and watershed-scale is available. Evaluation of P indices is necessary to provide the basis of modification and improvement of their usefulness as P management tools. In this study, the ability of the Texas P index to estimate P loss potential was evaluated by comparison with measured annual P loads over three years on four new pasture and six new cultivated litter application sites in the Texas Blackland Prairie. The Arkansas and lowa P indices were also evaluated. The Texas and lowa versions were able to provide reasonable estimates of P loss potential as illustrated with significant linear relationships (p < 0.01) between P index values and measured annual P loads. In general, the P index values, Mehlich 3 soil test P, and poultry litter application rate were better correlated with dissolved P concentrations and loads (r2 ranged from 0.12 to 0.91) than with total P and particulate P loads (r2 ranged from 0.00-0.31). A major source of error in P index load estimations was their inability to capture variability in annual soil erosion. This source of error was dramatically reduced by using measured erosion instead of estimated annual average erosion (average r2 values increased from 0.24 to 0.58). While these results illustrate a potential for the P indices to make relative P loss assessments, research on incentives to prevent buildup of soil P levels, linkages between P levels in soils and receiving waters, and other important issues related to the use of P indices is warranted.

Footnotes

  • R. Daren Harmel is an agricultural engineer at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service in Temple, Texas. H. Allen Torbert is a soil scientist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service in Auburn, Alabama. Paul B. DeLaune is a research associate at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Brian E. Haggard is a hydrologist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Rick L. Haney is a soil scientist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service in Temple, Texas.

  • Copyright 2005 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 60 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 60, Issue 1
January/February 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Field evaluation of three phosphorus indices on new application sites in Texas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Field evaluation of three phosphorus indices on new application sites in Texas
R.D. Harmel, H.A. Torbert, P.B. DeLaune, B.E. Haggard, R.L. Haney
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2005, 60 (1) 29-42;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Field evaluation of three phosphorus indices on new application sites in Texas
R.D. Harmel, H.A. Torbert, P.B. DeLaune, B.E. Haggard, R.L. Haney
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2005, 60 (1) 29-42;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Soil Vulnerability Index assessment as a tool to explain annual constituent loads in a nested watershed
  • Development of Agricultural Conservation Reduction Estimator (ACRE), a simple field-scale conservation planning and evaluation tool
  • Development and testing of a new phosphorus index for Kentucky
  • Development and validation of the Texas Best Management Practice Evaluation Tool (TBET)
  • Conservation Effects Assessment Project research in the Leon River and Riesel watersheds
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society