Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Integrated bioengineering and geotechnical treatments for streambank restoration and stabilization along a landfill

K. Barrett, W. Goldsmith and M. Silva
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2006, 61 (3) 144-152;
K. Barrett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Goldsmith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Silva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Vegetative-based bioengineering treatments were integrated with geotechnical treatments to provide effective, affordable and environmentally sound restoration and stabilization of an eroding streambank [8 m (27 ft) high and 145 m (470 ft) long] along a sanitary landfill adjacent to Mill Creek in Cincinnati, Ohio. Bank stabilization design featured the use of dormant live brush in several configurations: live poles installed through interstices in a rock toe; brush layers laid between geogrid-wrapped soil lifts; live stakes through a coir blanket, and a brush fascine staked in a trench near the top of bank. Vegetation has grown vigorously and no erosion problems have been observed. Bank stability was confirmed by a topographic survey in 2004 showing no observable difference from a post-construction survey in 1999. A quantitative vegetation survey in April 2004 determined essentially 100 percent grass coverage on the banks. Seventy-four percent of stakes/poles installed in the upper bank survived, while 39 percent in the lower bank survived. Overall, percent coverage by the shrub/tree layer was visually estimated at about 75 percent.

Footnotes

  • Kirk Barrett is the director at the Passaic River Institute at Montclair State University in Montclair, New Jersey. Wendi Goldsmith is a geomorpholo-gist and soil scientist for the Bioengineering Group, Inc. in Salem, Massachusetts. Marvin Silva is a former senior geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineer for the Bioengineering Group Inc. in Salem, Massachusetts.

  • Copyright 2006 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 61 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 61, Issue 3
May/June 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrated bioengineering and geotechnical treatments for streambank restoration and stabilization along a landfill
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Integrated bioengineering and geotechnical treatments for streambank restoration and stabilization along a landfill
K. Barrett, W. Goldsmith, M. Silva
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2006, 61 (3) 144-152;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Integrated bioengineering and geotechnical treatments for streambank restoration and stabilization along a landfill
K. Barrett, W. Goldsmith, M. Silva
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2006, 61 (3) 144-152;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparison of native woody species for use as live stakes in streambank stabilization in the southeastern United States
  • Biotechnical means of soil stabilization using willow cuttings
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
  • Benefits, barriers, and use of cover crops in the western United States: Regional survey results
  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society