Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherA Section

The under-appreciated climate factor in CEAP

A Guest editorial written by leading conservation professionals

J.D. Garbrecht, P.J. Starks and J.L. Steiner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2006, 61 (4) 110A-112A;
J.D. Garbrecht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.J. Starks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Steiner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A Guest editorial written by leading conservation professionals

Excerpt

Decade-long climate variations and associated impacts on runoff, soil erosion, and agrichemical movement may play a critical role in addressing the objectives of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). CEAP is a multi-agency effort to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practices used by private landowners participating in selected U. S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs (Mausbach and Dedrick, 2004). The project has two components, the National Assessment which provides summary estimates of conservation practice benefits, and the Watershed Assessment Studies that conducts basic research on conservation practices in selected watersheds to provide a framework for evaluating and improving the performance of national assessment models. In the context of the second component of CEAP, impacts of decade-long precipitation variations on runoff-induced soil erosion and agrichemical movement are of particular interest because effectiveness of conservation practices varies with the particular precipitation years used in its assessment. In this viewpoint, decade long precipitation variations and their relation to runoff and related conservation effects are briefly described. The magnitude of the resulting impacts on runoff is illustrated for the 770 km2 Fort Cobb Reservoir watershed in central Oklahoma, and the significance of these precipitation variations for …

Footnotes

  • J. Garbrecht is a Research Hydraulic Engineer, J. Steiner is a research leader, and P. Starks is a soil scientist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, Oklahoma.

  • Copyright 2006 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 61 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 61, Issue 4
July/August 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The under-appreciated climate factor in CEAP
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The under-appreciated climate factor in CEAP
J.D. Garbrecht, P.J. Starks, J.L. Steiner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2006, 61 (4) 110A-112A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The under-appreciated climate factor in CEAP
J.D. Garbrecht, P.J. Starks, J.L. Steiner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2006, 61 (4) 110A-112A;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An overview of research into conservation practice effects on soil and water resources in the Upper Washita Basin, Oklahoma, United States
  • Effectiveness of best management practices in improving water quality in a pasture-dominated watershed
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Communicating Conservation Effects Assessment Project results
  • Conservation practice effects on sediment load in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed
  • Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River Basin
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
  • Climate change impacts on soil, water, and biodiversity conservation
  • The urgent need for action
Show more A Section

Viewpoint

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • The urgent need for action
  • Flooding: Management and risk mitigation
Show more Viewpoint

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society