Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
OtherA Section

Recovering the promise of CSP

Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2007, 62 (2) 22A-23A;
Craig A. Cox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

In partnership with Environmental Defense and with help from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, SWCS is assessing the performance of four major USDA conservation programs: the Conservation Security Program (CSP), the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and the programs used to provide technical assistance for farm bill programs. Our goal is to help the conservation community better understand how these programs are working and to provide recommendations for how they may be improved. The first assessment we completed is of CSP.

Like most conservation organizations, SWCS celebrated the appearance of CSP in the 2002 farm bill, hoping it marked the beginning of a new approach to supporting agriculture and a deeper commitment to encouraging conservation. CSP has great potential to contribute to a well-focused, strategic conservation effort on the nation's working land. Our assessment suggests that CSP has unfortunately fallen far short of that promise.

The CSP statute envisioned an openended stewardship entitlement on a par with crop subsidies, but instead Congress has capped funding for the program six times. Many compromises have been made to adjust vision to budget reality, most of which have been severely criticized. Moreover, because all …

Footnotes

  • Craig A. Cox executive director of the Soil and Water Conservation Society.

  • Copyright 2007 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 62 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 62, Issue 2
March/April 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recovering the promise of CSP
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Recovering the promise of CSP
Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2007, 62 (2) 22A-23A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Recovering the promise of CSP
Craig A. Cox
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2007, 62 (2) 22A-23A;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • Climate and pest interactions pose a cross-landscape management challenge to soil and water conservation
  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
Show more A Section

Homefront

  • Conservation practice and global climate change
  • Reflections on 2010 International Annual Conference
  • Resource management complexity: Then and now
Show more Homefront

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society