Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Effectiveness of the soil conditioning index as a carbon management tool in the southeastern USA based on comparison with EPIC

D. A. Abrahamson, M. L. Norfeet, H. J. Causarano, J. R. Williams, J. N. Shaw and A. J. Franzluebbers
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2007, 62 (2) 94-102;
D. A. Abrahamson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. L. Norfeet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. J. Causarano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. R. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. N. Shaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. J. Franzluebbers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT:

Models are being developed and utilized by scientists and government agencies to quantify the potential for carbon storage in soil. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) v. 3060 model is a process-based model requiring detailed inputs. The soil conditioning index (SCI) is a simpler tool to predict relative change in soil organic carbon (SOC) using table values for three management components (i.e., organic matter, field operations, and erosion) within the framework of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2 model. Our objective was to determine whether SOC sequestration from no-tillage cropping systems in the southeastern USA could be simply predicted with SCI compared with detailed simulations using EPIC. Four management systems were evaluated: (1) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with conventional tillage, (2) cotton with no tillage, (3) corn (Zea mays L.)— cotton rotation with no tillage, and (4) bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.)—corn—cotton rotation with no tillage. All no-tillage systems used wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as a cover crop. Simulated SOC sequestration with EPIC was 0.46 ± 0.06 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (410 ± 51 lb ac−1 yr−1) under the three no-tillage management systems and -0.03 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (-30 lb ac−1 yr−1) under conventional tillage. The SCI also predicted a strong difference in SOC between conventional and no tillage. Differences in SOC sequestration among crop rotations were not readily apparent with EPIC but were with SCI. Predictions of SOC sequestration with SCI were comparable to those with EPIC but not necessarily in a linear manner as previously suggested. The SCI appears to be a valuable method for making reasonable, cost-effective estimates of potential changes in SOC with adoption of conservation management in the southeastern USA, although validations under actual field conditions are still needed.

Footnotes

  • Deborah A. Abrahamson is a hydrologist and Alan J. Franzluebbers is an ecologist at the J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation Center of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service in Watkinsville, Georgia. M. Lee Norfleet is a soil scientist at the Blacklands Research Center of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service in Temple, Texas. Hector J. Causarano is a graduate research assistant and Joey N. Shaw is a soil scientist at Auburn University in Auburn, Alabama. Jimmy R. Williams is an agricultural engineer at the Blacklands Research Center of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station in Temple, Texas.

  • Copyright 2007 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 62 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 62, Issue 2
March/April 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of the soil conditioning index as a carbon management tool in the southeastern USA based on comparison with EPIC
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of the soil conditioning index as a carbon management tool in the southeastern USA based on comparison with EPIC
D. A. Abrahamson, M. L. Norfeet, H. J. Causarano, J. R. Williams, J. N. Shaw, A. J. Franzluebbers
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2007, 62 (2) 94-102;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Effectiveness of the soil conditioning index as a carbon management tool in the southeastern USA based on comparison with EPIC
D. A. Abrahamson, M. L. Norfeet, H. J. Causarano, J. R. Williams, J. N. Shaw, A. J. Franzluebbers
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2007, 62 (2) 94-102;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluating soil organic carbon sequestration potential in the Cotton Belt with the soil conditioning index
  • Soil conditioning index and soil organic carbon in the Midwest and southeastern United States
  • Conservation considerations for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production: If, what, where, and how much?
  • Predicting soil organic carbon sequestration in the southeastern United States with EPIC and the soil conditioning index
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society