Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Water quality response times to pasture management changes in small and large watersheds

L.B. Owens, M.J. Shipitalo and J.V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2008, 63 (5) 292-299; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.292
L.B. Owens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.J. Shipitalo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.V. Bonta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To interpret the effects of best management practices on water quality at a regional or large watershed scale, likely response times at various scales must be known. Therefore, four small (≤1 ha [≤2.5 ac]) watersheds, in rotational grazing studies at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed near Coshocton, Ohio, were used to study management impacts on water quality and response times. Surface runoff was sampled on an event basis; groundwater discharge was sampled monthly from springs developed where a perching clay layer outcropped at the soil surface. In four large watersheds ranging from 18 to 123 ha (44 to 303 ac), base flow was over 50% of annual stream flow and approximately 20% of annual precipitation. Nitrate-N loads in base flow were 31% to 59% of total annual NO3-N load in stream flow. When the N fertilization rate in a “medium fertility” area that contains two small watersheds was increased from 56 to 168 kg ha-1 y-1 (50 to 150 lb ac-1 yr-1), NO3-N concentrations in groundwater discharge responded little in four years. Then NO3-N levels in groundwater discharge increased for 10 years. With discontinuation of N fertilization, NO3-N concentrations in groundwater discharge returned to pre-N increase levels after six years. In a “high fertility” grazing area with a similar perched water table, 224 kg N ha-1 (200 lb ac-1) was applied annually. Concentrations of NO3-N increased to >10 mg L-1 (ppm) after five years. Legumes were then interseeded into the grass forage, and mineral N fertilization was discontinued. Nitrate-N concentrations in groundwater discharge returned to their pre-fertilization levels after about five years. This multi-year response of groundwater discharge quality to management change in small watersheds indicates that the response time for measurable change in multi-square-mile watersheds will be equally long, if not longer, and trends will be muted.

Footnotes

  • Lloyd B. Owens is a soil scientist, Martin J. Shipitalo is a soil scientist, and James V. Bonta is a hydraulic engineer at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Coshocton, Ohio.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 5
September/October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water quality response times to pasture management changes in small and large watersheds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water quality response times to pasture management changes in small and large watersheds
L.B. Owens, M.J. Shipitalo, J.V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2008, 63 (5) 292-299; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.292

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water quality response times to pasture management changes in small and large watersheds
L.B. Owens, M.J. Shipitalo, J.V. Bonta
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2008, 63 (5) 292-299; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.292
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Communicating Conservation Effects Assessment Project results
  • Groundwater and stream response times to fertility management changes in pastures
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Influence of poultry litter on nutrient availability and fate in plant-soil systems: A meta-analysis
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society