Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature

L.S. Prokopy, K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf and A. Baumgart-Getz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2008, 63 (5) 300-311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300
L.S. Prokopy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Floress
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Klotthor-Weinkauf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Baumgart-Getz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This article reviews 25 years of literature focused on the adoption of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in the United States to examine general trends in the categories of capacity, awareness, attitudes and farm characteristics. The study uses a vote count methodology and counts every instance of positive, negative and insignificant relationships in 55 studies. Education levels, capital, income, farm size, access to information, positive environmental attitudes, environmental awareness, and utilization of social networks emerge as some of the variables that are more often positively, rather than negatively, associated with adoption rates. The type of statistical analysis used in the studies has a negligible effect on the results. When different types of BMPs are examined in similar groupings, the aggregated findings generally hold true. The study concludes that farmer adoption rates can be improved by focusing on the generally consistent determinants of agricultural BMP adoption. This paper also highlights future areas of research that are needed including a focus on the determinants of adoption of water and livestock management BMPs and more study of the role of tenure and farm proximity to a river or stream.

Footnotes

  • Linda S. Prokopy is an assistant professor and Kristin Floress and Adam Baumgart-Getz are PhD students in the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Denise Klotthor-Weinkauf is a master's student in the Departments of Earth and Atmospheric Science and Forestry and Natural Resources at Purdue University.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 5
September/October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature
L.S. Prokopy, K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, A. Baumgart-Getz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2008, 63 (5) 300-311; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature
L.S. Prokopy, K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, A. Baumgart-Getz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2008, 63 (5) 300-311; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Conservation plans and soil and water conservation practice use: Evidence from Iowa
  • What drives landowners conservation decisions? Evidence from Iowa
  • Modeling likelihood of farmer participation in the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Technical Assistance program in West Virginia
  • Risk, cost-share payments, and adoption of cover crops and no-till
  • A spatial analysis of high and low farmer participation in the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Technical Assistance program in West Virginia
  • Why do farmers care about rented land? Investigating the context of farmland tenure
  • What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?
  • An inductive framework of self-efficacy to understand and support farmers in conservation agriculture
  • Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature
  • Water conservation behaviors among beginning farmers in the western United States
  • The road less traveled: Assessing the impacts of farmer and stakeholder participation in groundwater nitrate pollution research
  • Identifying marginal land for Multifunctional Perennial Cropping Systems in the Upper Sangamon River watershed, Illinois
  • The influence of demonstration sites and field days on adoption of conservation practices
  • A review of low-grade weirs as an agri-environmental best management practice in the Elginfield Municipal Drain watershed, Ontario, Canada
  • Farmer adoption of cover crops in the western Lake Erie basin
  • Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation Programs
  • Assessment of beyond-the-field nutrient management practices for agricultural crop systems with subsurface drainage
  • Improving water quality knowledge through a focus on partnership: A University of Wisconsin Discovery Farms case study
  • An assessment of in-field nutrient best management practices for agricultural crop systems with subsurface drainage
  • Farmer preferences for conservation incentives that promote voluntary phosphorus abatement in agricultural watersheds
  • Delivering on the potential of formal farmer networks: Insights from Indiana
  • Measuring and understanding agricultural producers' adoption of nutrient best management practices
  • An Inductive Model of Farmer Conservation Decision Making for Nitrogen Management
  • Conservation management practices: Success story of the Hog Creek and Sturgeon River watersheds, Ontario, Canada
  • Farmer Transaction Costs of Participating in Federal Conservation Programs: Magnitudes and Determinants
  • Perceptions and use of cover crops among early adopters: Findings from a national survey
  • Cover crop adoption in Iowa: The role of perceived practice characteristics
  • Toward a collaborative approach to watershed management: Lessons learned from the Boone River Watershed, Iowa
  • Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption
  • People, place, behavior, and context: A research agenda for expanding our understanding of what motivates farmers' conservation behaviors
  • The impact of gender on agricultural conservation knowledge and attitudes in an Iowa watershed
  • A study of cattle producer preferences for best management practices in an East Tennessee watershed
  • Why do farmers adopt conservation tillage? An experimental investigation of framing effects
  • Farmer support for extending Conservation Compliance beyond soil erosion: Evidence from Iowa
  • Farmers and conservation programs: Explaining differences in Environmental Quality Incentives Program applications between states
  • Shifts in farmer uncertainty over time about sustainable farming practices and modern farming's reliance on commercial fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides
  • Adoption of win-win, environment-oriented, and profit-oriented practices among livestock farmers
  • Taking stock of voluntary nutrient management: Measuring and tracking change
  • Adoption of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in the New York City watershed: The role of farmer attitudes
  • Agricultural human dimensions research: The role of qualitative research methods
  • Determinants of the adoption of conservation practices by farmers in the Northwest Wheat and Range Region
  • Effects of outreach on the awareness and adoption of conservation practices by farmers in two agricultural watersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois
  • Understanding farmer adoption of agricultural best management practices
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing Soil Vulnerability Index classification with respect to rainfall characteristics
  • Trade-off analysis of water conservation and water consumption of typical ecosystems at different climatic scales in the Dongjiang River basin, China
  • Long-term subsoiling and straw return increase soil organic carbon fractions and crop yield
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society