Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality

M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman and C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 360-370; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.360
M.D. Tomer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.B. Moorman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.G. Rossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Iowa's South Fork watershed is dominated by corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] rotations, and animal feeding operations are common. Artificial subsurface (tile) drainage is extensive; hydric soils cover 54% of the watershed. During spring and early summer, NO3-N concentrations in tile and stream discharge often exceed 20 mg L-1. Total N loads during 2002 to 2005 ranged from 16 to 26 kg NO3-N ha-1 y-1 (14 to 23 lb ac-1 yr-1). Nitrate concentrations increased linearly with log baseflow, effectively a surrogate measure of tile discharge. Phosphorus loads were only 0.4 to 0.7 kg P ha-1 y-1 (0.4 to 0.6 lb ac-1 yr-1), but concentrations commonly exceeded 0.1 mg L-1, a eutrophication-risk threshold. Mean E. coli populations in the stream exceeded 500 cells 100 ml-1 during summer. Statistical comparison of actual nitrate records with independent records generated using regression equations provided modeling efficiencies of 0.91 or less, suggesting performance targets for watershed model validation. Tile drainage is more important in transport of nitrate and dissolved phosphorus than E. coli. Variations in nitrate, phosphorus, and E. coli are uniquely timed, highlighting the complexity of integrated water quality assessments.

Footnotes

  • Mark D. Tomer is a soil scientist and Thomas B. Moorman is a microbiologist at the National Soil Tilth Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa. Colleen G. Rossi is a soil scientist at the Blacklands Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality
M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 360-370; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.360

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality
M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 360-370; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.360
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Temporal trends in amount and placement of conservation practices in the South Fork of the Iowa River watershed
  • Evaluation of the Soil Vulnerability Index for artificially drained cropland across eight Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Assessment of runoff water quality for an integrated best management practice system in an agricultural watershed
  • Stream bank and sediment movement associated with 2008 flooding, South Fork Iowa River
  • Genes Indicative of Zoonotic and Swine Pathogens Are Persistent in Stream Water and Sediment following a Swine Manure Spill
  • Surface soil quality in five midwestern cropland Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Evaluating hydrology of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with new tile drain equations
  • Historical channel movement and sediment accretion along the South Fork of the Iowa River
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Women taking action: Multisession learning circles, storytelling, and an ecosystem of relationships for conservation
  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society