Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices

M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, D.E. James, G. Hadish and C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 371-379; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.371
M.D. Tomer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.B. Moorman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.E. James
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Hadish
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.G. Rossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Documenting the types and extent of conservation practices in a watershed is necessary to determine their water quality impacts. A conservation practice inventory for the South Fork of the Iowa River, 85% in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] rotations, showed only 7% of cropland was managed using no-tillage. About 30% of cropland receives manure annually, prior to corn. Surface residue following soybean was usually inadequate (<30%), indicating a key management challenge. About 90% of fields with >34% highly erodible land, subject to USDA conservation compliance, indeed had erosion-control practices installed. Grassed waterways and riparian buffers were common edge-of-field practices, and highly erodible land fields near streams often had multiple practices and rotations including third crops. Yet, while most conservation practices are aimed at controlling runoff, tile drainage is the dominant hydrologic pathway. Resource management systems that address tile drainage as the primary route of nutrient loss need to be developed and encouraged. Better targeting of this pathway could include practices such as nutrient removal wetlands.

Footnotes

  • Mark D. Tomer is a soil scientist, Thomas B. Moorman is a microbiologist, and David E. James is a GIS specialist at the National Soil Tilth Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa. Greg Hadish is a geographic analyst with USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Des Moines, Iowa. Colleen G. Rossi is a soil scientist at the Blacklands Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices
M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, D.E. James, G. Hadish, C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 371-379; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.371

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices
M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, D.E. James, G. Hadish, C.G. Rossi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 371-379; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.371
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multispectral satellite mapping of crop residue cover and tillage intensity in Iowa
  • Effects of hydrology, watershed size, and agricultural practices on sediment yields in two river basins in Iowa and Mississippi
  • Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
  • Evaluating hydrology of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with new tile drain equations
  • Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 1. Water quality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society