Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio

K.W. King, P.C. Smiley, B.J. Baker and N.R. Fausey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 380-395; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.380
K.W. King
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. Smiley Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.J. Baker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.R. Fausey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Impacts of watershed scale conservation practice adoption on sediment, nutrient, and pesticide losses and adjacent stream biota are not well understood. The objective of this study was to examine the suitability of selected paired watersheds to quantify hydrology, chemical, and ecology effects of conservation practice implementation for channelized and unchannelized watersheds in Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio. Channelized watersheds were more similar in watershed characteristics than the unchannelized watersheds. One hydrology, eight water chemistry, and five fish community response variables were measured. Most response variables in both watershed pairs were moderately correlated (r > 0.6), but the minimum percent change required to detect a response difference was greater for the unchannelized watersheds. Detectable temporal trends in the difference between like response variables for the channelized and unchannelized watershed pairs were minimal. These results validate the paired watershed design and suggest that conservation practice induced changes in hydrology, water quality, and fish communities can be quantified.

Footnotes

  • Kevin W. King is an agricultural engineer and Peter C. Smiley Jr. is a research ecologist at the Soil Drainage Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Columbus, Ohio. Barbara J. Baker is a soil scientist at the Conservation Service Findlay Service Center, USDA Natural Resources, Findlay, Ohio. Norman R. Fausey is a soil scientist at the Soil Drainage Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio
K.W. King, P.C. Smiley, B.J. Baker, N.R. Fausey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 380-395; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.380

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio
K.W. King, P.C. Smiley, B.J. Baker, N.R. Fausey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 380-395; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.380
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • STEWARDS: A decade of increasing the impact of Agricultural Research Service watershed research programs
  • Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils
  • Evaluation of the Soil Vulnerability Index for artificially drained cropland across eight Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Assessment of runoff water quality for an integrated best management practice system in an agricultural watershed
  • A twice-paired watershed experimental design to assess stacked practices through field-edge monitoring
  • Effect of crop type and season on nutrient leaching to tile drainage under a corn-soybean rotation
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • Surface soil quality in five midwestern cropland Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Impacts of drainage water management on subsurface drain flow, nitrate concentration, and nitrate loads in Indiana
  • The frequency of channel-forming discharges in a tributary of Upper Big Walnut Creek, Ohio
  • Fish community response to evolving channel complexity in an agricultural headwater system
  • Conservation practice establishment in two northeast Iowa watersheds: Strategies, water quality implications, and lessons learned
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society