Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Water quality and conservation practice effects in the Choptank River watershed

G.W. McCarty, L.L. McConnell, C.J. Hapeman, A. Sadeghi, C. Graff, W.D. Hively, M.W. Lang, T.R. Fisher, T. Jordan, C.P. Rice, E.E. Codling, D. Whitall, A. Lynn, J. Keppler and M.L. Fogel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 461-474; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.461
G.W. McCarty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.L. McConnell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.J. Hapeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Sadeghi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Graff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.D. Hively
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.W. Lang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.R. Fisher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Jordan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.P. Rice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.E. Codling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Whitall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lynn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Keppler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.L. Fogel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Choptank River is an estuary, tributary of the Chesapeake Bay, and an ecosystem in decline due partly to excessive nutrient and sediment loads from agriculture. The Conservation Effects Assessment Project for the Choptank River watershed was established to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices on water quality within this watershed. Several measurement frameworks are being used to assess conservation practices. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and herbicides (atrazine and metolachlor) are monitored within 15 small, agricultural subwatersheds and periodically in the lower portions of the river estuary. Initial results indicate that land use within these subwatersheds is a major determinant of nutrient concentration in streams. In addition, the 18O isotope signature of nitrate was used to provide a landscape assessment of denitrification processes in the presence of the variable land use. Herbicide concentrations were not correlated to land use, suggesting that herbicide delivery to the streams is influenced by other factors and/or processes. Remote sensing technologies have been used to scale point measurements of best management practice effectiveness from field to subwatershed and watershed scales. Optical satellite (SPOT-5) data and ground-level measurements have been shown to be effective for monitoring nutrient uptake by winter cover crops in fields with a wide range of management practices. Synthetic Aperture Radar (RADARSAT-1) data have been shown to detect and to characterize accurately the hydrology (hydroperiod) of forested wetlands at landscape and watershed scales. These multiple approaches are providing actual data for assessment of conservation practices and to help producers, natural resource managers, and policy makers maintain agricultural production while protecting this unique estuary.

Footnotes

  • Gregory W. McCarty and Ali Sadeghi are research soil scientists, Laura L. McConnell, Cathleen J. Hapeman, and Clifford P. Rice are research chemists, W. Dean Hively and Megan W. Lang are associate research scientists, and Eton E. Codling is a research agronomist at the Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland. Carrie Graff is a project scientist at LimnoTech Inc., Washington, DC. Thomas R. Fisher is a professor at the Center for Environmental Science, University of Maryland, Cambridge, Maryland. Thomas Jordan is a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland. David Whitall is an ecologist at the Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland. Anne Lynn is the state resource conservationist with the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, Annapolis, Maryland. Jason Keppler is an implementation coordinator for the Maryland Department of Agriculture, Annapolis, Maryland. Marilyn L. Fogel is a staff member at the Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.

  • © 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water quality and conservation practice effects in the Choptank River watershed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water quality and conservation practice effects in the Choptank River watershed
G.W. McCarty, L.L. McConnell, C.J. Hapeman, A. Sadeghi, C. Graff, W.D. Hively, M.W. Lang, T.R. Fisher, T. Jordan, C.P. Rice, E.E. Codling, D. Whitall, A. Lynn, J. Keppler, M.L. Fogel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 461-474; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.461

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water quality and conservation practice effects in the Choptank River watershed
G.W. McCarty, L.L. McConnell, C.J. Hapeman, A. Sadeghi, C. Graff, W.D. Hively, M.W. Lang, T.R. Fisher, T. Jordan, C.P. Rice, E.E. Codling, D. Whitall, A. Lynn, J. Keppler, M.L. Fogel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 461-474; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.461
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Estimating the effect of winter cover crops on nitrogen leaching using cost-share enrollment data, satellite remote sensing, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) modeling
  • Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils
  • Performance of the Soil Vulnerability Index with respect to slope, digital elevation model resolution, and hydrologic soil group
  • Evaluation of the Soil Vulnerability Index for artificially drained cropland across eight Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • Nitrate fate and transport through current and former depressional wetlands in an agricultural landscape, Choptank Watershed, Maryland, United States
  • Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society