Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Relative magnitudes and sources of sediment in benchmark watersheds of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project

A. Simon and L. Klimetz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 504-522; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.504
A. Simon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Klimetz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 63 no. 6 504-522
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.504

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online November 3, 2008.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. A. Simon and
  2. L. Klimetz

Article usage

Article usage: November 2008 to February 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Nov 200895142
Dec 200857112
Jan 20096201
Feb 20092502
Mar 20091001
Apr 20092602
May 20091503
Jun 20092602
Jul 20091806
Aug 2009601
Sep 20091803
Oct 20091002
Nov 20092002
Dec 20091200
Jan 20101500
Feb 20101203
Mar 20102305
Apr 20102705
May 20101001
Jun 20102206
Jul 20101101
Aug 20101202
Sep 20101202
Oct 20101905
Nov 20101902
Dec 20101401
Jan 20111602
Feb 20111303
Mar 20111800
Apr 20111506
May 20111701
Jun 2011600
Jul 20111500
Aug 20112702
Sep 2011501
Oct 20111902
Nov 20111300
Dec 20111000
Jan 20121404
Feb 2012504
Mar 20122503
Apr 20122604
May 20123401
Jun 20122503
Jul 20121801
Aug 20121301
Sep 20121203
Oct 20121900
Nov 20122000
Dec 2012800
Jan 20131100
Feb 2013900
Mar 2013601
Apr 20131000
May 20131501
Jun 2013804
Jul 2013400
Aug 2013700
Sep 2013200
Oct 2013502
Nov 2013400
Dec 2013800
Jan 2014502
Feb 2014802
Mar 2014902
Apr 2014500
May 20141501
Jun 2014800
Jul 2014403
Aug 2014501
Sep 20141202
Oct 2014400
Nov 20141101
Dec 2014601
Jan 20152801
Feb 20151300
Mar 2015600
Apr 2015901
May 20151001
Jun 2015301
Jul 2015800
Aug 20151101
Sep 2015300
Oct 20151300
Nov 2015800
Dec 20151100
Jan 2016501
Feb 20161001
Mar 20161002
Apr 2016601
May 2016901
Jun 2016200
Jul 20161501
Aug 20161001
Sep 20161401
Oct 2016700
Nov 2016401
Dec 20161201
Jan 20171300
Feb 20171503
Mar 20171301
Apr 2017800
May 20172500
Jun 20171001
Jul 2017900
Aug 20172301
Sep 20171100
Oct 2017801
Nov 20171101
Dec 20171300
Jan 20181300
Feb 20181200
Mar 2018700
Apr 2018802
May 20181400
Jun 2018600
Jul 2018900
Aug 2018501
Sep 20184500
Oct 20183400
Nov 2018401
Dec 2018500
Jan 2019300
Feb 2019600
Mar 2019600
Apr 2019400
May 2019900
Jun 20191901
Jul 2019401
Aug 20191300
Sep 2019600
Oct 2019700
Nov 20191400
Dec 20191602
Jan 20202000
Feb 20201500
Mar 2020701
Apr 2020500
May 2020801
Jun 20201601
Jul 20201400
Aug 20203000
Sep 2020500
Oct 20202000
Nov 2020200
Dec 20201100
Jan 20211701
Feb 20211401
Mar 20213901
Apr 20212600
May 20211100
Jun 2021800
Jul 20211800
Aug 20211000
Sep 20211301
Oct 20213201
Nov 2021500
Dec 20211601
Jan 20221500
Feb 20222500
Mar 20222703
Apr 20224000
May 20223300
Jun 2022801
Jul 20221600
Aug 20221900
Sep 20221100
Oct 2022500
Nov 20222000
Dec 20221300
Jan 202325800
Feb 2023400

Cited By...

  • 59 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relative magnitudes and sources of sediment in benchmark watersheds of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Relative magnitudes and sources of sediment in benchmark watersheds of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
A. Simon, L. Klimetz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 504-522; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.504

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Relative magnitudes and sources of sediment in benchmark watersheds of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
A. Simon, L. Klimetz
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 504-522; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.504
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparing Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) practice placements for runoff mitigation and controlled drainage among 32 watersheds representing Iowa landscapes
  • An overview of research into conservation practice effects on soil and water resources in the Upper Washita Basin, Oklahoma, United States
  • Temporal trends in amount and placement of conservation practices in the South Fork of the Iowa River watershed
  • Factors controlling streambank erosion and phosphorus loss in claypan watersheds
  • Stream bank and sediment movement associated with 2008 flooding, South Fork Iowa River
  • Current patterns and future perspectives of best management practices research: A bibliometric analysis
  • Effects of hydrology, watershed size, and agricultural practices on sediment yields in two river basins in Iowa and Mississippi
  • Suspended sediment supply dominated by bank erosion in a low-gradient agricultural watershed, Wildcat Slough, Fisher, Illinois, United States
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • Fine sediment sources in Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Impact of weather and climate scenarios on conservation assessment outcomes
  • Stream bank erosion as a source of sediment and phosphorus in grazed pastures of the Rathbun Lake Watershed in southern Iowa, United States
  • Conservation practice establishment in two northeast Iowa watersheds: Strategies, water quality implications, and lessons learned
  • Effects of the resolution of soil dataset and precipitation dataset on SWAT2005 streamflow calibration parameters and simulation accuracy
  • Historical channel movement and sediment accretion along the South Fork of the Iowa River
  • The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
  • Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River Basin
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
  • Cropping system drives microbial community response to simulated climate change and plant inputs
  • Women taking action: Multisession learning circles, storytelling, and an ecosystem of relationships for conservation
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society