Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings

C.W. Richardson, D.A. Bucks and E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2008, 63 (6) 590-604; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.590
C.W. Richardson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.A. Bucks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.J. Sadler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 63 no. 6 590-604
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.590

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online November 3, 2008.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2008 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. C.W. Richardson,
  2. D.A. Bucks, and
  3. E.J. Sadler

Article usage

Article usage: November 2008 to March 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Nov 2008152954
Dec 2008116945
Jan 200991049
Feb 200942040
Mar 200931033
Apr 200937031
May 200939033
Jun 200938028
Jul 200919023
Aug 20091209
Sep 200927025
Oct 200931027
Nov 20093806
Dec 20092700
Jan 20103203
Feb 201037012
Mar 201041013
Apr 20105009
May 20103405
Jun 20103207
Jul 20101703
Aug 20105404
Sep 20105003
Oct 201019018
Nov 201035036
Dec 201040015
Jan 201131016
Feb 201149016
Mar 201135019
Apr 201129013
May 201126023
Jun 201121019
Jul 201134021
Aug 201146032
Sep 201120018
Oct 201141029
Nov 201128118
Dec 201151015
Jan 201225016
Feb 201233012
Mar 201230030
Apr 201247031
May 201224017
Jun 201229019
Jul 201234016
Aug 201219024
Sep 201222016
Oct 201221021
Nov 201225015
Dec 20122306
Jan 201317011
Feb 201331023
Mar 201361042
Apr 201354039
May 201343027
Jun 201322014
Jul 201323017
Aug 20131405
Sep 201334018
Oct 201326220
Nov 201318010
Dec 20131209
Jan 201422014
Feb 201416019
Mar 201428027
Apr 201424031
May 201426010
Jun 201438020
Jul 20141207
Aug 20141506
Sep 20141207
Oct 20141906
Nov 201424013
Dec 20141908
Jan 201539019
Feb 20153406
Mar 20151405
Apr 201527014
May 20151002
Jun 20152602
Jul 20153409
Aug 20152104
Sep 201523013
Oct 20151207
Nov 20151704
Dec 20151719
Jan 20161004
Feb 20161507
Mar 20161903
Apr 201620011
May 20161607
Jun 20161819
Jul 201622438
Aug 20165105
Sep 201652113
Oct 20164218
Nov 20164114
Dec 20163004
Jan 20175315
Feb 20174008
Mar 20175802
Apr 20174516
May 20172616
Jun 20171211
Jul 20171005
Aug 20171803
Sep 20171415
Oct 20172919
Nov 20171416
Dec 201715111
Jan 20181712
Feb 20181217
Mar 20181934
Apr 20182405
May 20182525
Jun 20181814
Jul 20181603
Aug 20181003
Sep 2018905
Oct 20181405
Nov 2018701
Dec 2018602
Jan 2019705
Feb 2019902
Mar 20198011
Apr 201917011
May 2019906
Jun 2019805
Jul 20191203
Aug 201919011
Sep 20191105
Oct 20191808
Nov 201913013
Dec 20191609
Jan 20201007
Feb 20201507
Mar 20201205
Apr 20202202
May 20202408
Jun 20201702
Jul 20202001
Aug 20202803
Sep 20201805
Oct 20203309
Nov 202014010
Dec 202016010
Jan 20211706
Feb 20212206
Mar 20212005
Apr 20213503
May 20212807
Jun 20211806
Jul 20212908
Aug 20211705
Sep 20212308
Oct 202126020
Nov 202126014
Dec 20211504
Jan 202236011
Feb 20222707
Mar 20222403
Apr 20224009
May 202247036
Jun 20221409
Jul 20221706
Aug 20222803
Sep 20221308
Oct 20221906
Nov 20222209
Dec 20221102
Jan 2023295015
Feb 20232303
Mar 20231202

Cited By...

  • 87 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 63 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 63, Issue 6
November/December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
C.W. Richardson, D.A. Bucks, E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 590-604; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.590

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings
C.W. Richardson, D.A. Bucks, E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2008, 63 (6) 590-604; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.63.6.590
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • STEWARDS: A decade of increasing the impact of Agricultural Research Service watershed research programs
  • Use of soft data for multicriteria calibration and validation of Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender: Impact on model simulations
  • Addressing agricultural phosphorus loss in artificially drained landscapes with 4R nutrient management practices
  • Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
  • Conservation management practices: Success story of the Hog Creek and Sturgeon River watersheds, Ontario, Canada
  • Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • Surface soil quality in five midwestern cropland Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Precipitation data considerations for evaluating subdaily changes in rainless periods due to climate change
  • Evaluating hydrology of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with new tile drain equations
  • The frequency of channel-forming discharges in a tributary of Upper Big Walnut Creek, Ohio
  • Farm-level economic impact of no-till farming in the Fort Cobb Reservoir Watershed
  • Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change
  • Conservation practice establishment in two northeast Iowa watersheds: Strategies, water quality implications, and lessons learned
  • Targeting land-use change for nitrate-nitrogen load reductions in an agricultural watershed
  • Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed
  • Crop residue is a key for sustaining maximum food production and for conservation of our biosphere
  • How do we identify opportunities to apply new knowledge and improve conservation effectiveness?
  • Effects of the resolution of soil dataset and precipitation dataset on SWAT2005 streamflow calibration parameters and simulation accuracy
  • Historical channel movement and sediment accretion along the South Fork of the Iowa River
  • Soil and Water Assessment Tool evaluation of soil and land use geographic information system data sets on simulated stream flow
  • Enhancing conservation on agricultural landscapes: A new direction for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
  • Sustaining the Earth's Watersheds-Agricultural Research Data System: Overview of development and challenges
  • The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project
  • Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River Basin
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society