Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Performance of compost filter socks and conventional sediment control barriers used for perimeter control on construction sites

L.B. Faucette, J. Governo, R. Tyler, G. Gigley, C.F. Jordan and B.G. Lockaby
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2009, 64 (1) 81-88; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.1.81
L.B. Faucette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Governo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Tyler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Gigley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.F. Jordan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.G. Lockaby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Applied Polymer Systems
    . 2006. Applied Polymer Systems Inc. www.siltstop.com.
    1. Barrett M.E.,
    2. Malina J.F.,
    3. Charbeneau R.J.
    . 1998. An evaluation of geotextiles for temporary sediment control. Water Environment Research 70(3):283-290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Brady N.C.,
    2. Weil R.R.
    . 1996. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 11th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    1. Demars K.R.,
    2. Long R.P.,
    3. Ives J.R.
    . 2000. Use of Wood Waste Materials for Erosion Control. New England Transportation Consortium.
    1. Faucette L.B.,
    2. Jordan C.F.,
    3. Risse L.M.,
    4. Cabrera M.,
    5. Coleman D.C.,
    6. West L.T.
    . 2005. Evaluation of storm water from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):288-297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Faucette L.B.,
    2. Tyler R.
    . 2006. Organic BMPs used for storm water management. 2006 International Erosion Control Association Conference No. 37 Technical Session Proceedings, Storm Water Management, Long Beach, CA. 101-108.
    1. Fifield J.
    2001. Designing for Effective Sediment and Erosion Control on Construction Sites. Santa Barbara, CA: Forester Press.
    1. Filtrexx International
    . 2007. Filtrexx International Standard Specifications and Design Manual, Version 5.0, Section 1.1: Filtrexx SiltSoxx and Appendix 4.26: Filtrexx FilterMedia, US Patent #7,226,240.
    1. Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission
    . 2000. Georgia Erosion and Sediment Control Manual, 5th ed. Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
    1. Glanville T.D.,
    2. Persyn R.A.,
    3. Richard T.L.
    . 2001. Impacts of compost application on highway construction sites in Iowa. 2001 American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Annual International Meeting. Sacramento, CA. Paper 01-012076.
    1. Hayes S.A.,
    2. McLaughlin R.A.,
    3. Osmond D.L.
    . 2005. Polyacrylamide use for erosion and turbidity control on construction sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(4):193-199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Keener H.,
    2. Faucette B.,
    3. Klingman M.
    . 2007. Flow-through rates and evaluation of solids separation of compost filter socks vs. silt fence in sediment control applications. Journal of Environmental Quality 36(3):742-752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kelsey K.,
    2. Johnson T.,
    3. Vavra R.
    . 2006. Needed information: Testing, analysis, and performance values for slope interruption perimeter control BMPs. In International Erosion Control Association Conference Technical Session Proceedings, Long Beach, CA.
    1. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
    . 2005. Kentucky Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Field Guide. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
    1. Risse M.,
    2. Faucette B.
    . 2001. Compost Utilization for Erosion Control. University of Georgia Extension Bulletin number 1200. http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caes-pubs/pubs/PDF/B1200.pdf.
    1. Sadeghi A.,
    2. Faucette B.,
    3. Sefton K.
    . 2006. Sediment and nutrient removal from storm runoff with compost filter socks and silt fence. In 2006 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Conference, Portland, OR.
    1. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute
    . 2001. SAS System 8.2 for Microsoft Windows. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.
    1. South Carolina Department of Transportation
    . 2006. South Carolina Department of Transportation. Materials and Research, Approved Materials: Approval Policies and Approval Sheets for Construction and Maintenance Materials. http://www.dot.state.sc.us/doing/ConstructionDocs/pdfs/Materials/policy57.pdf.
    1. Theisen M.,
    2. Spittle K.
    . 2006. Evaluating sediment retention devices under standardized test conditions. In 2006 International Erosion Control Association Conference No. 37 Technical Session Proceedings, Erosion and Sediment Control, Long Beach, CA. 221-230.
    1. USDA Soil Conservation Service
    . 1968. USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey Clarke and Oconee Counties, Georgia. Washington, DC; USDA.
    1. US Soil Conservation Service
    . 1986. Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Washington, DC: USDA.
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 1983. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes, EPA-600/4 4-79-020. Cincinnati, OH: US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. USEPA
    . 1999. Standard operating procedure for the analysis of residue, non-filterable (suspended solids) water. Method 160.2NS. Chicago, IL: Region 5 Central Regional Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. USEPA
    . 2006. Compost Filter Berm: Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control. National Menu of Best Management Practices for Construction Sites, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II.
  1. Weather Channel. 2005. www.weather.com/weather/climatology/monthly/30602.
    1. Wischmeier W.J.,
    2. Smith D.D.
    . 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Loss—A Guide to Conservation Planning, Agr. Handbook No. 537, Washington DC: USDA.
    1. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
    . 2005. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. 2005 Standard Specifications, Section 628 Erosion Control.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 64 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 64, Issue 1
January/February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Performance of compost filter socks and conventional sediment control barriers used for perimeter control on construction sites
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Performance of compost filter socks and conventional sediment control barriers used for perimeter control on construction sites
L.B. Faucette, J. Governo, R. Tyler, G. Gigley, C.F. Jordan, B.G. Lockaby
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2009, 64 (1) 81-88; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.1.81

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Performance of compost filter socks and conventional sediment control barriers used for perimeter control on construction sites
L.B. Faucette, J. Governo, R. Tyler, G. Gigley, C.F. Jordan, B.G. Lockaby
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2009, 64 (1) 81-88; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.1.81
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Sorbent-amended compost filter socks in grassed waterways reduce nutrient losses in surface runoff from corn fields
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Women taking action: Multisession learning circles, storytelling, and an ecosystem of relationships for conservation
  • Influence of gypsum and cover crop on greenhouse gas emissions in soybean cropping systems
  • Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society