Performance-based payments for water quality: Experiences from a field experiment

REFERENCES

1. 1. Cacapon Institute

   . 2002. Final Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Water Quality Studies in the Cacapon River's Lost and North River Watersheds in West Virginia. High View, WV: Cacapon Institute.
2. 1. Cacapon Institute

   . 2008. Farmers as Producers of Clean Water: Providing Economic Incentives for Reducing Agricultural Non-point Pollution. High View, WV: Cacapon Institute. http://www.cacaponinstitute.org/wvunri.htm.
3. 1. Maille P.J.

   2008. Performance-Based Payments for Conservation: Experience from a Water Quality Field Experiment. PhD dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
4. 1. Morgan C.,
   2. Nicole O.

   . 2001. Benefits of water quality policies: The Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Economics 39:271-284.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Ribaudo M.O.,
   2. Horan R.D.,
   3. Smith M.E.

   . 1999. Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice. Agricultural Economic Report 782. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer782/aer782.pdf.
6. 1. US Environmental Protection Agency

   . 2002. Water Quality Conditions in the United States: A Profile from the 2000 National Water Quality Inventory. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/305b/2000report/factsheet.pdf.
7. 1. US General Accounting Office

   . 2005. Chesapeake Bay Program: Improved Strategies Are Needed to Better Assess, Report, and Manage Restoration Progress. GAO-06-96. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
8. 1. Wunder S.,
   2. Engel S.,
   3. Pagiola S.

   , ed. 2008. Payments for Environmental Services in Developing and Developed Countries (Special Issue). Ecological Economics 65(4).